DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The Chattanooga Heart Institute to notify 170,450 about March “data security incident”

Posted on July 29, 2023 by Dissent

In May, DataBreaches dutifully noted The Chattanooga Heart Institute (CHI) on our non-public worksheets. At the time, all we knew was that Karakurt threat actors had claimed to have attacked them and to have exfiltrated 158 GB of data. There was no proof of claim offered, but Karakurt wrote:

Employees and patients’ private data will soon be here available for everyone. Medical records, tests results, diagnoses, social security numbers, passports, addresses, phone numbers, financial data and other documents are going to be uploaded.

CHI never replied to the inquiry DataBreaches sent them on May 23, but on July 28, they notified the Maine Attorney General’s Office that 170,450 people were affected by an incident that they describe on its website as a “data security incident” or “cyberattack.”

The notice explains that on April 17, they detected indicators of a cyberattack and initiated their response plan. An investigation, conducted with the assistance of an external forensics firm, found that the network had been accessed between March 8 and March 16, but it wasn’t until  May 31 that they learned that patients’ protected health information and guarantors’ information had been acquired. There was no evidence that the data had been retrieved from the EMR system.

The information that could have been subject to unauthorized access reportedly includes patient or guarantor name, mailing address, email address, phone number, date of birth, driver’s license number, Social Security number, account information, health insurance information, diagnosis/condition information, lab results, medications and other clinical, demographic or financial information.

Notifications have yet to be sent out to all those affected; CHI indicates letters will be sent out “over the coming weeks” as detailed reviews of files are completed. Those notified will be offered credit monitoring and identity theft restoration services.

But nowhere in CHI’s notification does it ever reveal that there was a ransom demand from a known criminal group. Nor is there any mention that patient data might show up on the dark web.

As of publication, Karakurt has not leaked any of the data. DataBreaches will continue to monitor the leak site to see if patient data, guarantor data, or employee information is ever leaked there.

Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalware

Post navigation

← Arizona man who extorted Georgia Tech sentenced to prison
Attacked by Black Basta, BankCard USA paid ransom. →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.