DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

StayWell breach affects over 12,000; how many more not disclosed (update1)

Posted on March 13, 2014 by Dissent

A breach at StayWell Health Management in 2012 resulted in at least three HIPAA-covered entities notifying patients, members, or employees. The incident was posted to HHS’s public breach tool in an update this week.  According to HHS’s entries, Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan notified 10,024 members while Clorox Company Group Insurance Plan notified 520 members and Nissan North America in Tennessee notified 1,511.

Entries on HHS’s breach tool show breach dates in March, April, and May of 2012, with the breach coded as “Unauthorized Access/Disclosure,Network Server.”

PHIprivacy.net contacted StayWell to ask for additional details, and was sent the following statement dated February 25, 2014:

StayWell Health Management has notified approximately 10,024 individuals that five spreadsheets containing information about their participation in the 2012 Eat for the Health of It or Stress Quest programs were made accessible through an internet search because the spreadsheets were inadvertently stored in a publicly accessible folder on StayWell’s system. StayWell Health Management administered these programs for Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan (MCHCP). These spreadsheets contained each participant’s first and last name, email address, unique internal identification number, the then current week of the program, whether a participant elected to receive email notifications, and whether a participant had taken two short program surveys. The spreadsheets did not contain any other personally identifiable information.

These spreadsheets were accessible from March 23, 2012 to January 22, 2014. After being notified of the error on January 21, 2014, StayWell restricted access and removed the spreadsheets from public accessibility and has implemented additional educational and technological steps to ensure that this type of situation does not occur again.

StayWell is operating a toll-free call center to handle questions from affected participants between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Central Time Monday through Thursday, 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Friday, and 8 a.m. and 1 p.m. Saturday. The number is 855-428-6325.

As required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has been notified of the incident.

In additional communications to PHIprivacy.net, a StayWell spokesperson indicated that Clorox and Nissan also had similar types of information disclosed, as described above. They would not disclose, however, how many other StayWell clients were affected by the breach, nor the total number affected, saying, “To  ensure privacy and confidentiality, we cannot provide additional information at this time.” I guess we’ll just have to see if any other entries show up on HHS’s breach tool.

Update1: A commenter, below, reports that University of Minnesota employees were also affected. If you received a letter from any other entity not already named in the post, please give the name of your employer/StayWell’s client, and the details of the breach notification letter you received if it’s anything different than what’s already been reported here. 

Related posts:

  • HIPAA Security Rule Facility Access Controls – What are they and how do you implement them?
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Former patient sues St. Helena Hospital over alleged privacy breach
UK: Home care agency warned after vulnerable people’s details left in the street →

2 thoughts on “StayWell breach affects over 12,000; how many more not disclosed (update1)”

  1. Anonymous says:
    March 14, 2014 at 5:32 pm

    University of Minnesota Employees who had been part of Staywell’s Step It Up program received similar letters about a similar breach. Our letters were dated Feb 21, 2014. The letter indicated that the breach began March 29, 2012 but was not noticed until January 21, 2014. Given that employees were strong-armed into participating (in order to reduce future premiums) this lax treatment of our data is rather alarming (but no longer surprising).

    1. Anonymous says:
      March 14, 2014 at 7:46 pm

      Thank you identifying another StayWell client whose employees were affected. Sorry you’re going through it, though.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.