DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Privacy shield crucial for online health records (opinion)

Posted on March 7, 2008October 24, 2024 by Dissent

Dr. Deborah Peel of PatientPrivacyRights.org writes in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

[…]

Now America is on the threshold of entering the digital era of health record keeping. Google and Microsoft have just introduced health record keeping software. Congress is considering standards to make health record systems interoperable, allowing easy access to records using different software and from different health care providers.

While Congress takes its time trying to determine standards, HHS pushes ahead with its experiment with medical records systems. Perdue and state legislators and health officials should ask these questions:

• Is the HHS site plan premised on the right of consent? In other words, in nonemergency situations does the patient have the right to determine who sees her information and under what circumstances?

Consent given for one reason is not readily transferable. It applies simply for that reason.

In other words, if a patient agrees to have her doctor share her record with a specialist, that record should not also be part of research or marketing efforts without separate, informed consent.

• Does the HHS plan allow patients to segment sensitive parts of their record, not permitting widespread access? In other words, a nurse delivering a flu shot will not be entertained by the details of one’s suicide attempt when one was a teenager three decades ago.

• Does the HHS plan provide for an audit trail to determine who has accessed your health records and under what circumstances? Georgians would likely be astounded to see how many eyes are on our private health information.

The foremost beneficiaries of widespread availability of health data will not be patients.

It will be employers who will use that data in helping to determine hiring. It may be credit firms.

It will be the data-mining firms that will use that data to push their wares on consumers.

Georgians need to know that there are no effective standards to protect privacy using health information technology right now.

The U.S. Senate nearly passed a bill, the Wired for Health Care Quality Act, only to have it held up because the American Medical Association and privacy advocates, including Patient Privacy Rights, were concerned it lacked effective privacy protections.

Now Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) has introduced the Trust Act, which contains effective privacy protections and which is supported by groups ranging from Gun Owners of America to the National Association of Social Workers.

Georgians need to pressure the state Legislature to explore not just the benefits of electronic medical records, but also the potential pitfalls.

Preventive medicine is not just for aches and pains, it’s sound practice in this new digital era.

Full Story – Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Health 2.0: A Promising Prescription (opinion)
Paperless patients →

1 thought on “Privacy shield crucial for online health records (opinion)”

  1. Anonymous says:
    March 7, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    I am a medical doctor. I see patients every day. Including the Emergency Room where I work.

    During thousands years physician have follow this hippocrates oath sencente: What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must spread abroad, I will keep to myself, holding such things shameful to be spoken about.

    So at the moment I designed the keyose (www.keyose.com) service, I have a very clear idea: privacy must be the priority number one!

    Read more on:
    http://blog.keyose.com/2008/02/28/broken-privacy-is-a-real-threat-trust-me/

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hacker steals $223 million in Cetus Protocol cryptocurrency heist
  • Operation ENDGAME strikes again: the ransomware kill chain broken at its source
  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say
  • 16 Defendants Federally Charged in Connection with DanaBot Malware Scheme That Infected Computers Worldwide
  • Russian national and leader of Qakbot malware conspiracy indicted in long-running global ransomware scheme
  • Texas Doctor Who Falsely Diagnosed Patients as Part of Insurance Fraud Scheme Sentenced to 10 Years’ Imprisonment
  • VanHelsing ransomware builder leaked on hacking forum
  • Hack of Opexus Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
  • ‘Deep concern’ for domestic abuse survivors as cybercriminals expected to publish confidential abuse survivors’ addresses

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says
  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.