DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Navigenics #6 – “Privacy, Insurance, GINA and Ethics”

Posted on April 11, 2008October 24, 2024 by Dissent

Elaine Warburton of Genetics & Health writes:

Continuing G&H’s exclusive interview with Navigenics’ Medical Director Dr Michael Nierenberg, we explore the whole issue of privacy, insurance, GINA and ethics…..

One of the main consumer concerns is that of privacy of information, both in terms that a genetic test has been undertaken but also that the results of the test are kept private and out of the public domain. At the time of writing, the controversial GINA (Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act) is being passed by the US Senate which will enable genetic testing information to be kept private and not be used to discriminate against an individual, particularly by the insurance industry. The insurance industry is understandable against the Bill.

Dr Nierenberg. Navigenics’ Medical Director, advises that Navigenics takes the whole issue of security of data very seriously.

“Navigenics takes precautions such as multiple servers, encryption and security audits … each member has access to their own section of the website which is password protected. However, if a member forgets their password, there is a highly complicated route to get back in. It is not just a case of emailing the password to an email address. … GINA legislation will be helpful in terms of protecting sensitive information”.

The company has also incorporated a rigorous Ethics Advisory Board tasked to develop policies and report to the Executive Board in the fields of bioethics, patient rights, health information technology and technology and data security.

Read more of the interview on Genetics & Health

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Snooping in records has a history at UCLA
Privacy Experts' Roundtable Report Will Highlight Privacy & Security Week →

2 thoughts on “Navigenics #6 – “Privacy, Insurance, GINA and Ethics””

  1. Anonymous says:
    April 11, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    I am member of Life Insurance Canada team and this topic is discussed also here. Today, there are medical tests, enabling clients to achieve some bonus in price of life insurance policy. Maybe the genetic tests could be treated similarly – not to create obstacle, but to give advantage. But – do you really think governemnt will be able to secure those information? Do you think that chain doctors-nurses-laborants-IT experts- … will be so tight??

  2. Anonymous says:
    April 11, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    Honestly? I’ve been in health care for over 25 years. I’ve also been covering privacy news and breaches for over 7 years. At this point, I am not optimistic about security or privacy. In fact, I advise my patients that if they can afford it, don’t submit to insurance because I worry about the files that are being created that might come back to haunt them — or that could get lost, stolen, or exposed.

    Ask yourself: if your child had a serious mental health issue, would you want to see that record exposed on the internet?

    Then think about the two health insurance company breaches revealed this past week. Both totally and readily easily avoidable, and yet they happened.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Oklahoma Expands its Security Breach Notification Law
  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was
  • Rajkot civic body’s GIS website hit by cyber attack, over 400 GB data feared stolen
  • Taiwan’s BitoPro hit by NT$345 million cryptocurrency hack
  • Texas gastroenterology and surgical practice victim of ransomware attack
  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements
  • Pro-Ukraine hacker group Black Owl poses ‘major threat’ to Russia, Kaspersky says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty
  • Supreme Court Agrees to Clarify Emergency Situations Where Police Don’t Need Warrant
  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.