DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

PCI’s Shield Suffers Another Blow As Heartland Reports a Hack

Posted on January 20, 2009 by Dissent

More on the Heartland Payment Systems breach reported earlier today…. from Digital Transactions:

[…]

Princeton, N.J.-based Heartland is one of the nation’s largest acquirers, processing for about 250,000 merchant locations. It has a number of business units, including its so-called Network Services segment serving mostly petroleum retailers that Heartland bought last year from Alliance Data Systems Corp. The malware was placed on a system for processing card transactions from about 155,000 mostly small and mid-sized business locations, many of which are restaurants. Restaurants have a comparatively high rate of data breaches, but Baldwin says the incident did not involve merchants. “This malware was designed to capture the transaction as it was being processed in our system,” he says. “This was inside our firewalls; this was not at all at a merchant location.”

Visa Inc. and MasterCard Inc. first alerted Heartland of suspicious transactions late in the fall, according to Baldwin. The ensuing investigation did not uncover the usual suspect—a common point of purchase linking the fraud. That led to a more difficult investigation, essentially consisting of two audits, to a find common point of processing, says Baldwin. The probe finally pointed to Heartland’s system and led to the discovery of the malware. Asked when the malware was planted, Baldwin says, “we have some strong suspicions, but at this point it’s still speculative. This was a sophisticated attack.” After obtaining approvals from affected parties, Tuesday “was the earliest we could get” the news disclosed publicly, he adds.

[…]

Heartland is a non-bank acquirer that uses Cleveland-based KeyBank as its primary sponsor into the Visa and MasterCard networks. Its other sponsor is its former co-owner, St. Louis-based Heartland Bank.

Source – Digital Transactions


Related:

  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
Category: Financial SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Payroll manager gets 5 years, told to repay $500,000
ZA: Three waiters to go on trial →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.