DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

LA Not-So-Confidential: Los Angeles Police Protective League alerts members to breach

Posted on February 7, 2009 by Dissent

DataBreaches.net obtained a copy of the letter sent by the Los Angeles Police Protective League to its members after the Los Angeles Police Department exposed confidential files concerning racial bias/profiling complaints against officers. The text of the letter follows:

February 6, 2009

Dear Members and Friends:

The League has been made aware of a serious breach of privacy committed by the Los
Angeles Police Department that impacts our members. The names and personal information of all officers investigated by the Department for racial profiling/bias complaints in 2008 were negligently released on the Department’s Website and emailed to the public who have requested to receive the Police Commission’s agenda, highlighting why the League has fought so diligently to safeguard officer privacy.

The League was made aware of the Department’s error on Friday afternoon by a Los Angeles Times reporter. We immediately contacted the Police Commission to ensure that the data was removed from the Internet. It is unknown at this time how many people may have accessed the information in addition to the Times. The Times did not publish the names of the officers who have done nothing wrong. However, there is no way to retrieve the information that was already emailed out or downloaded by the public.

The 19-page PDF submitted from the Chief of Police’s office to the Los Angeles Police
Commission shows the names, ages, serial numbers, race, and gender of the accused officers. It also reveals the names and personal data of the complainant, the nature of the allegation, and disposition of the case.

The full report was accidentally uploaded to the Police Commission’s section of the
Website to update its meeting agenda material. It should be noted that the complaints against the officers were determined by the Department to be unfounded. This means not only was sensitive information disclosed, but the names of completely innocent officers may be irrevocably damaged.

The League has fought hard in recent years to ensure that the names and personal data of
officers being investigated for potential wrongdoing stay private, despite opposition from powerful opponents in the state legislature and the media, including State Senator Gloria Romero’s attempt to overturn the Copley decision protecting officer privacy for two years in a row.

Many people have questioned why the LAPPL has fought so hard to oppose the unraveling of the California Supreme Court ruling in Copley Press vs. Superior Court, which held that neither the media nor members of the public may have access to police discipline records filed or created during administrative appeals, including the identity of a disciplined officer, unless the officer waives his/her privacy right.

The negligent release of the report underscores a point that the LAPPL has been making for several years – confidential information about officers is not secure. Had the Times decided to publish the names, officers accused but cleared of wrongdoing may have had their reputations tarnished for good. Especially now that news stories find permanence on the internet, our officers and their families could easily find themselves living under a life-long cloud of suspicion.

In this latest incident, the Los Angeles Police Department demonstrated that it cannot
guarantee the confidentiality of even its own internal investigations. We appreciate the value of transparency; however, not at the risk of public safety or the safety of our officers and their families. To that end, I have personally called and made a complaint with the Department regarding this serious breach of privacy. I have requested that officers who were negligently identified be contacted by the Department and made aware of the situation. The Board of Directors has authorized our General Counsel to research causes of action available to the League and its members and will seek an immediate and fair remedy.

Very truly yours,

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Los Angeles Police Protective League

PAUL M. WEBER
President

Los Angeles Police Protective League
1308 West Eighth Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
phone: (213) 251-4554

Category: Breach IncidentsExposureGovernment SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← Add Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh to list….
Update on Best Buy breach: 4,000 customers possibly affected →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked
  • UK: Legal Aid Agency hit by cyber security incident
  • Public notice for individuals affected by an information security breach in the Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division of Helsinki
  • PowerSchool paid a hacker’s extortion demand, but now school district clients are being extorted anyway (3)
  • Defending Against UNC3944: Cybercrime Hardening Guidance from the Frontlines
  • Call for Public Input: Essential Cybersecurity Protections for K-12 Schools (2025-26 SY)
  • Cyberattack puts healthcare on hold for hundreds in St. Louis metro
  • Europol: DDoS-for-hire empire brought down: Poland arrests 4 administrators, US seizes 9 domains

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Apple Siri Eavesdropping Payout Deadline Confirmed—How To Make A Claim
  • Privacy matters to Canadians – Privacy Commissioner of Canada marks Privacy Awareness Week with release of latest survey results
  • Missouri Clinic Must Give State AG Minor Trans Care Information
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • No Postal Service Data Sharing to Deport Immigrants
  • DOGE aims to pool federal data, putting personal information at risk
  • Privacy concerns swirl around HHS plan to build Medicare, Medicaid database on autism

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.