DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Get Ready for EHR Failures, But Don’t Blame the Software

Posted on March 16, 2009 by Dissent

Austin Merritt of Software Advice is a proponent of EHR and has written a column that identifies what he sees as major reasons why EHR adoption may fail:

Our concern is that the subsidies won’t change healthcare providers’ late adopter mindsets about information technology. Providers may jump at “free software” and try to avoid penalties (starting in 2015), but will they:

  • Truly believe in the value of an EHR over traditional paper charts?
  • Take a leadership role in advocating adoption of the new EHR in their practice?
  • Change their old workflows to match the best practices in leading EHRs?
  • Ride out the difficult stages of new software adoption and change management?
  • Take part in intensive training to learn the new system?

I don’t know that providers need to truly believe in something before they implement it — or even after they implement it. As a healthcare provider, there are many things I must do or need to do for a variety of reasons, regardless of whether I believe in their value. Indeed, when it comes to EMR/EHR, I think that skepticism is an appropriate attitude until we see more evidence of their actual value and and demonstrations of adequate security.

While most sources talk about reducing prescription errors, etc., what advantages do EHR actually offer to those in the field of mental health who are not dealing with prescription-writing? Electronic records pose even greater risks in terms of security than paper records. Has anyone seen any health-related breaches where the amount of exposed or potentially compromised data was larger for a paper breach than an electronic breach? I haven’t.

Austin makes five recommendations:

1. Become a project manager.
2. Rally everyone else.
3. Buy the best training you can.
4. KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid.
5. Be prepare to practice differently.

In these tough economic times, I wonder how realistic some of this is.

Switching over to EMR/EHR, even gradually, is a huge investment of time and money. Doctors who are already squeezing in too many patients to too little time are now supposed to be project managers? Clinics that may be laying off clinical staff are going to hire IT consultants? This doesn’t sound that likely to me.

While I understand the “don’t blame the software” viewpoint, I know from experience that even when you try to investigate to find the right software for your needs, you may wind up investing time and money in a product or system that does not serve you well down the road and that instead of making your life easier and more productive, becomes the application from hell. This is not a problem specific to EHR, of course. Unless the software has backwards compatibility, health care professionals may find themselves in a real mess down the road, assuming that they can even get started.

What do others think?

Update: Jeff Drummon offers a different take/reaction on his blog.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Mayo puts HealthVault on hold, PHR questions linger
IL: Drug database raises privacy concerns →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Iran-Linked Threat Actors Leak Visitors and Athletes’ Data from Saudi Games
  • UK: Oxford City Council still investigating cyberattack from earlier this month
  • Steelmaker Nucor Says Hackers Stole Data in Recent Attack
  • People’s Republic of China cyber threat activity: Cyber Threat Bulletin
  • Ukrainian Web3 security auditing company Hacken suffered an attack that allowed a hacker to create 900 million HAI tokens
  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.
  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.