DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

OIS Commentary: And some walls will come tumbling down

Posted on June 3, 2009 by Dissent

One of yesterday’s posts on PHIprivacy.net reports a data breach involving Kelsey-Seybold Clinic that has not been reported in the mainstream media. I contacted Kelsey-Seybold after a site visitor alerted me to the breach. The report is frustratingly short on details, though, because Kelsey-Seybold could — and did — simply ignore questions it did not to want to answer. Perhaps they provided their patients with a fuller disclosure, and I hope they did, but the contrast between their approach to voluntary public disclosure and that of Johns Hopkins Hospital is striking.

Thankfully, when the HITECH Act provisions incorporated in Public Law 111-5 (ARRA) go into effect, entities who have stonewalled reporters or bloggers or who otherwise try to keep breaches out of the media will probably have to rethink their public relations and disclosure approach. Although not all breaches involving personal health information (PHI) will have to be publicly disclosed, many more will, and the notice and notification provisions in the law include both publishing a notice in prominent media outlets and notifying the federal government who will post the breach on a public web site maintained by Health & Human Services (HHS).

Under the contents of notification provisions of HITECH, we still won’t necessarily know how many patients were affected in any particular breach (other than it affected 500 or more), and it is not clear to me whether saying a “laptop was stolen was from an employee” would suffice for the brief description of if the entity would have to include the location of the theft (from the office, vehicle, home, etc.), but I am hopeful that we will get more information than we have gotten to date.

The breach notification requirements under the HITECH Act go into effect 30 days after the date that interim final regulations are promulgated, which was to be no later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the law in February. If HHS does publish the regulations by August 16, 2009, the breach notification obligations should go into effect mid-September. Maybe I’ll post a countdown clock on the site so that I have something to look forward to.

Related posts:

  • Kelsey-Seybold Clinic patients in second breach or one multi-year breach?
  • Who got breached in #ProjectWhiteFox 1.6 million Account leak
Category: Breach IncidentsBreach LawsCommentaries and AnalysesFederalHealth DataID TheftInsiderLegislationLost or MissingTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← NZ: Police investigate alleged leak from DNA database
UK: ID database snooped for celebrities’ secrets →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit
  • British national “IntelBroker” charged with causing $25 million in damages; U.S. seeks his extradition from France

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report