DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

ID Theft Arrests in Durham NC (update 2)

Posted on July 6, 2009 by Dissent

Alamance County and Durham police have charged Alexis Brooke Faison with 10 counts of identity theft. Durham detectives believe Faison may be connected to at least 30 more cases of identity theft in the Durham area, according to a press release mentioned in a Times-News story on June 25th. The Herald-Sun subsequently reported that two people have been charged by Durham police in ID thefts “that allegedly relied on information they obtained from a 3-year-old list of city employees.” Although the two reports may be linked, the Herald-Sun’s report does not mention any names and is not available online without registration. No press release could be found on either Alamance County’s web site or Durham’s web site.

This post will likely be updated as more information becomes available.

Update: Ok, the two news reports were related, as suspected. WRAL is now reporting:

Floyd McSwain, 23, of Amber Ridge Lane in Raleigh, was charged with 72 counts of identity theft involving more than 200 victims and 18 counts of trafficking in stolen identities. Alexis Faison, 26, of 1028 Slateworth Drive in Durham, was charged with 13 counts of identity theft, which involved more than 35 victims.

Since the names of city employees are generally a matter of public record, I’m not “scoring” this one as a breach of the government sector. The article does not indicate how or where they stole personal information that might not have been included on the list and that was used for ID theft.

Update of July 8: The Herald-Sun reports that 8 current and former city employees were victims of identity theft. The list was a 2006 list of 216 city workers

Category: ID TheftU.S.

Post navigation

← Patent Rights and Civil Wrongs: The ACLU Lawsuit
NV’s New Encryption Law Made Moot? →

2 thoughts on “ID Theft Arrests in Durham NC (update 2)”

  1. identitytheft says:
    July 6, 2009 at 4:11 pm

    “Since the names of city employees are generally a matter of public record”
    Its kinda scary to hear that. It seems like its almost too easy to steal people’s identities. Something drastic must be done to combat this problem.

    1. admin says:
      July 6, 2009 at 4:18 pm

      If you think that’s scary, you should see the story I’m preparing for PogoWasRight.org. Check the site later for a report on a bombshell study.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Fresno County fell victim to $1.6M phishing scam in 2020. One suspected has been arrested, another has been indicted.
  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.