DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CVS, Walgreens settle with Indiana AG

Posted on July 10, 2009 by Dissent

Settlements have been reached between the Indiana Attorney General’s office and two pharmacy chains – CVS and Walgreens – to resolve data-breach complaints that customers’ medical information was improperly discarded in trash bins outside pharmacy stores. The agreement comes as the Attorney General begins a new concerted effort geared to address the growing problem of identity theft.

Under the agreements, negotiated by the Attorney General’s office and representatives of the Indiana Board of Pharmacy, both CVS/pharmacy and Walgreen Co. agree to implement extensive employee training, management policies and detailed reporting to provide greater safeguards so that customers’ personal information will not be improperly disclosed.

Filed today, both proposed agreements are scheduled for consideration by the Board of Pharmacy on Monday, July 13, and would take effect upon the board’s order.

“By locking in new records-handling procedures, the agreements create a new level of protection for customers of these pharmacies that their private medical information will remain just that – private and confidential,” Indiana Attorney Greg Zoeller said.

The cases involved 10 CVS pharmacies and six Walgreens pharmacies in Indiana. In 2006, an Indianapolis television station aired news segments about customers’ prescription records being discovered in outdoor trash bins where they could have been found and used to commit identity theft, although no actual consumer is known to have been victimized.

After investigating, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General filed administrative complaints in 2007 with the Board of Pharmacy against the licenses of individual pharmacies and pharmacists involved in the data disclosures at the stores.

Disclosing confidential medical information violates state and federal laws, including the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA. The federal Office for Civil Rights also investigated the privacy breaches; and eventually it reached its own settlement with CVS where that company agreed to pay the federal government $2.25 million in civil penalties. The OCR’s federal case involving Walgreen Co. is ongoing.

“Our goal has been to provide a consistent resolution on the CVS and Walgreens cases so that they will follow new requirements that will establish strong standards. The bottom line: consumers of both chains will be protected,” Zoeller added.

Under the agreements, both CVS and Walgreens will submit annual reports with the Board that detail changes to their policies, their employee training programs and other steps to comply with state and federal privacy laws. All pharmacy employees at the stores will be trained on the new rules. And if any medical-privacy breach happens in the future, CVS or Walgreens would be required to notify the Board of Pharmacy and Attorney General’s Office.

Under the agreement, CVS will make a $1,000 donation to a charity of its choice, in addition to the $2.25 million it paid under the federal agreement. Walgreens will pay $6,000 to reimburse all costs to the state for its investigation.

“These payments are not intended to be punitive; they represent the companies’ commitments to ensuring consumers’ privacy,” Zoeller said. “This comes at a time we are making a concerted effort to address the growing problem of identity theft in Indiana. Under enhancements to state and federal laws, we now will have additional legal tools to protect Hoosiers.”

Both companies issued statements about the proposed settlement agreements:

“CVS/pharmacy is committed to being an industry leader in privacy matters and places a high priority on protecting the privacy of its customers. This matter relates to the alleged inadvertent disposal of patient information at a small number of Indiana CVS/pharmacy locations in 2006 in a manner that was inconsistent with our policies and procedures,” said Christine Egan, Vice President of Privacy Practices at CVS Caremark. “Our settlement obligations with the State of Indiana reinforce our existing business practices in regard to protecting patient information, employee training on privacy issues, and monitoring the effectiveness of privacy policies and procedures on a regular basis.”

The statement from Walgreen Co.:

“We are glad to reach this agreement and believe we have always followed HIPAA standards. We have sound practices and policies that protect our patients’ information, and we will continue to adhere to them.”

The Board of Pharmacy had a representative at each set of negotiations with the Attorney General’s office and the pharmacy companies.

Source: Office of the Indiana Attorney General


Related:

  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
Category: Breach IncidentsExposureHealth DataOf NotePaperU.S.

Post navigation

← California dreaming
Public safety, health privacy, and the ADA thrown into the mess →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.