DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Online gene testers propose their own regulations

Posted on July 18, 2009 by Dissent

After gene testing businesses were criticized by state regulators last year for marketing to California residents without a license to perform clinical laboratory tests, the industry decided it was time for new regulations — which it decided to write.

A bill drafted by 23andMe and introduced by state Sen. Alex Padilla (D-San Fernando Valley) would exempt gene-testing firms from requirements faced by other kinds of labs while adding new privacy protections for consumers.

The Mountain View company believes its regulations are better suited to modern math-based genetic analyses, rather than the conventional world of test tubes. Last year, the California Department of Public Health sent “cease and desist” letters to 23andMe, Foster City-based Navigenics and10 other genomics firms to comply with a state law that regulates laboratories in California. The companies later obtained licenses — but they now argue that they should not need to.

Read more in The Santa Cruz Sentinel. This appears to be a very complicated issue that requires scrutiny. In the article, it mentions that 23andMe is one of several companies that are also using the tests to compile a vast database of genetic information of data that could be worth millions of dollars to outside researchers. If that’s the case, then is their proposal — that companies delete identifying information linked to customers’ data and gain the consent of customers before using the data for research — sufficient? I would think that it’s not, and that any company or lab handling identifiable or potentially re-identifiable genetic information should be considered a covered entity under HIPAA with all that entails. If it means revising HIPAA, so be it.

“We want to be regulated, but the current body of laws does not fit,” said spokesman Jim Gross of 23andMe, which was co-founded by Anne Wojcicki, married to Google’s Sergey Brin. 23andMe is backed in part by Google and Genentech. “The current law is focused almost completely on ‘wet labs,’ which process a biological sample. We are dealing with data, not the actual sample.”

“We’re not practicing medicine,” he said. “This is information about who you are, what your body is about.”

And to the extent that information about who you are and what your body is about is health information, then why should this not be considered protected health information? A lab that runs blood tests is not practicing medicine, it is analyzing specimens. Yet they are covered. So, too should these other entities be covered.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Francis Howell SD laptop stolen
More on California's 823 breach reports →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.