DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Coalition for Patient Privacy Calls on HHS to Repeal the Breach Notification Rule

Posted on October 28, 2009 by Dissent

The Coalition for Patient Privacy urges the Department of Health and Human Services to revise and repeal the interim final rule (IFR) establishing requirements for notification of breaches of unsecured protected health information.

“We are dismayed and disappointed with the IFR, particularly with the inclusion of a ‘harm standard’. HHS went far beyond the intent of Congress. This is a real blow to accountability and transparency,” said Ashley Katz, Executive Director of Patient Privacy Rights, the organization that leads the Coalition.

On October 1, leadership from the House Ways & Means Committee and Energy & Commerce Committee urged HHS Secretary Sebelius to revise or repeal the harm standard.

Under HHS’ interpretation, an entity responsible for a breach may avoid providing notice of a breach if that entity determines there is no “significant risk of financial, reputational or other harm to the individual.” This exclusion weakens the breach notification requirement dramatically, granting the company that would like to avoid the cost and consequences of breach notification the power to decide if they will notify.

There was no mention of any harm standard in HHS’ previous Request for Information, thwarting any opportunity for public debate.

Currently, individuals have higher standards and expectations for our financial data than we do for our health data. With a breach of financial records, a consumer faces a significant headache, but ultimately can have their credit and funds restored; this is not the case with health records. A stigmatizing diagnosis, condition or prescription in the wrong hands can cause irreversible damage and discrimination.

Ensuring ironclad protections against theft and misuses of PHI must be the price of doing business in health care. “If an entity cannot or will not protect our most sensitive data, they should not be in the health care business,” said Katz.

Signing organizations to the HHS letter include: American Association of People with Disabilities, American Civil Liberties Union, American Council of the Blind, Clinical Social Work Association, Consumer Action, JustHealth, The Multiracial Activist, The National Coalition of Mental Health Professionals and Consumers, Patient Privacy Rights, Private Citizen, Inc., Telecommunications for the Deaf & Hard of Hearing, Inc., and the U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation.

Letter from Coalition for Patient Privacy:
http://www.patientprivacyrights.org/site/DocServer/HHS_CommentsIFRBreach_Final.pdf?docID=6161

Source: Coalition for Patient Privacy

No related posts.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Identity theft victim dropped by health insurance company
Tennessee man pleads guilty to ID theft, fraud involving military credit accounts →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake.
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records
  • Qilin claims attack on Accu Reference Medical Laboratory. It wasn’t the lab’s first data breach.
  • Louis Vuitton hit by data breach in Türkiye, over 140,000 users exposed; UK customers also affected (1)
  • Infosys McCamish Systems Enters Consent Order with Vermont DFR Over Cyber Incident

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.