DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Report: Data Breaches Hike Fraud Risk 400%

Posted on November 2, 2009 by Dissent

By Doug Pollack, Chief Marketing Officer for ID Experts:

Because data breaches have become such commonplace incidents, there is concern that people have become desensitized to the potential harm they face upon receiving a notification letter from an organization informing them that sensitive information has been lost or misappropriated.

A recently published report from Javelin Strategies should be a wake up call to those people.

The Javelin report, Data Breach Notifications: Victims Face Four Times Higher Risk of Fraud, is based on multiple years of data and includes updates on 2009 data breaches, implications of changes to the legislative landscape and the technical means by which data breaches occur.

This report should also be heeded by those banks, healthcare organizations, government agencies, insurance companies and others that we entrust with our social security and checking account numbers, birthdates and mothers’ maiden names,  and in some cases our personal health information.

Primary Questions

  • Is there a link between data breach notification letters and identity fraud?
  • Are data breach notification letters working?
  • In the face of escalating data breaches, what should financial institutions and other companies do to protect brands and customer loyalty?
  • How do victims respond to breach notification, and how does this impact their relationship with their financial institution?
  • Are paper or electronic records most vulnerable?
  • How are criminals obtaining data records?

There is now proof that data breach incidents put the affected individuals in harms way.

This report is mainly based on consumer data collected from Javelin’s annual Identity Fraud Survey. The survey is conducted each year using computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) via random-digit dialing from 4,784 respondents in October 2008, 5,075 respondents in October 2007, and 5,000 respondents in October 2006. The surveys targeted respondents based on representative proportions of gender, age and income compared to the overall U.S. online population.

Some data also came from Dataloss.db.org, an open community research project that documents known and reported data loss incidents worldwide. Some data also came from the Identity Theft Resource Center, a non-profit organization that compiles information about public data breaches to help understand and prevent identity theft.

The responsibility for doing everything possible to help these people address this harm — from identifying identity fraud to cleaning up the fraud — should fall squarely on the laps of the entrusted organizations.

—

The Publisher gives permission to link, post, distribute, or reference this article for any lawful purpose, provided attribution is made to the author and to Information-Security-Resources.com

No related posts.

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Commissioner Cavoukian issues new publication in collaboration with the National Association for Information Destruction: Best Practices for the Secure Destruction of Personal Health Information
Health insurance mandate alarms some →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Five youths arrested on suspicion of phishing
  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure
  • Kentfield Hospital victim of cyberattack by World Leaks, patient data involved
  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen
  • Iranian and Pro-Regime Cyberattacks Against Americans (2011-Present)
  • Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims
  • Nova Scotia Power Data Breach Exposed Information of 280,000 Customers
  • No need to hack when it’s leaking: Brandt Kettwick Defense edition
  • SK Telecom to be fined for late data breach report, ordered to waive cancellation fees, criminal investigation into them launched

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.