DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Too diligent? Royal Mail worker ‘demands baby’s signature’

Posted on November 7, 2009 by Dissent

Richard Savill reports:

John Berry, 70, said he was startled when he was told by the worker at a sorting office that he could not pick up the package on behalf of his new-born granddaughter, Amber.

The retired aerospace engineer cycled to the depot in Cheltenham, Glos, after a postman dropped a card through his letter box to say a package was waiting for the infant.

But when he arrived he was told that only Amber could sign for it because her name was on the parcel.

“It was absolutely ridiculous,” said Mr Berry, who has lived in the same house in Cheltenham for 43 years.

“I was frustrated because I had many forms of identification on me, including my driving licence, which proved I lived at the address on the parcel.

“He still wouldn’t allow me to take the package claiming that Amber needed to sign for it herself. I told him she was a baby but he kept persisting.”

Read more in the Telegraph.

Photo credit: John Giles/PA Wire


Related:

  • Canada says hacktivists breached water and energy facilities
  • UK: FCA fines former employee of Virgin Media O2 for data protection breach
  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
  • China Amends Cybersecurity Law and Incident Reporting Regime to Address AI and Infrastructure Risks
  • Alan Turing institute launches new mission to protect UK from cyber-attacks
  • Some lower-tier ransomware gangs have formed a new RaaS alliance -- or have they? (1)
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← CVS under investigation by FTC again
Play.com hit by ordering glitch →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.