DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

639-count indictment of 15 allegedly involved in NYC ID theft ring

Posted on November 12, 2009 by Dissent

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced a 639-count indictment of 15 individuals in connection with a $600,000 pickpocketing and identity theft ring which compromised at least 60 accounts at various bank branches in New York City.

The defendants are Arthur Franklin, Joseph Simms, Vincent Franklin, James Mannix, Kathleen Miller, Carol Dibitetto, Larry Ford, Kandra Lysland, Tina Barboza, Mary Bennett, Yvonne Harris, and three unidentified woman and one unidentified man. Each of them has been indicted on multiple felony charges, including grand larceny, identity theft, criminal possession of a forged instrument, conspiracy, scheme to defraud, attempted grand larceny and criminal possession of stolen property. The crimes charged in the indictment occurred between October 1, 2008 and October 31, 2009.

The investigation leading to the indictment began when a fraud investigator at Chase Bank discovered what appeared to be unrelated fraudulent bank transactions at various Chase branches. While viewing surveillance videotape of these transactions, the investigator noticed that the transactions primarily were conducted by women wearing wigs, hats, and glasses. In addition, although different women were carrying out the transactions, one man, Arthur Franklin, regularly was present in the bank and appeared to be monitoring the person conducting the fraudulent transaction. Franklin stood out because he often was dressed as a construction worker. In a couple of instances, he wore a doctor’s uniform, including a stethoscope. Further review of the surveillance videos revealed that defendants Joseph Simms and Vincent Franklin also supervised the fraudulent bank transactions. Chase Bank determined that the victims of these transactions had all reported having been pickpocketed or having lost a wallet or bank documents.

Defendants Miller and Mannix were employed at a collection agency in Harrisburg, PA. Both had access to Accurint, a computer program through which personal identifying information can be obtained, including addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth, and telephone numbers. Although Miller and Mannix were authorized to conduct only work-related searches and were not permitted to share any information obtained with anyone outside of their workplace, at Franklin’s request, they both allegedly conducted searches to obtain personal identifying information of pickpocket victims, including social security numbers, and sold that information to Franklin.

Franklin allegedly then provided the stolen identification information, financial documents, and personal identifying information of the victims, to other defendents, who, in turn, dressed up like the pickpocket victims, trying to match each victim’s appearance as closely as possible using, in some instances, a wig, hat, glasses, and makeup.

Source: Manhattan District Attorney’s Office

Related posts:

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
Category: ID TheftTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← Heartland Update: Some St. Mary’s debit cards compromised
AZ: Former Quebedeaux employee sentenced for fraud and identity theft →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Kentfield Hospital victim of cyberattack by World Leaks, patient data involved
  • India’s Max Financial says hacker accessed customer data from its insurance unit
  • Brazil’s central bank service provider hacked, $140M stolen
  • Iranian and Pro-Regime Cyberattacks Against Americans (2011-Present)
  • Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims
  • Nova Scotia Power Data Breach Exposed Information of 280,000 Customers
  • No need to hack when it’s leaking: Brandt Kettwick Defense edition
  • SK Telecom to be fined for late data breach report, ordered to waive cancellation fees, criminal investigation into them launched
  • Louis Vuitton Korea suffers cyberattack as customer data leaked
  • Hunters International to provide free decryptors for all victims as they shut down (2)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations
  • Record-Breaking $1.55M CCPA Settlement Against Health Information Website Publisher
  • Ninth Circuit Reviews Website Tracking Class Actions and the Reach of California’s Privacy Law
  • US healthcare offshoring: Navigating patient data privacy laws and regulations
  • Data breach reveals Catwatchful ‘stalkerware’ is spying on thousands of phones
  • Google Trackers: What You Can Actually Escape And What You Can’t
  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.