DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Groups seek CVS Caremark privacy violation probe

Posted on November 23, 2009 by Dissent

As a follow-up and update to a complaint initially reported here, Dinah Wisenberg Brin of Dow Jones Newswires reports:

Consumer advocates and a national pharmacists’ group have asked the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Health and Human Services to investigate possible violations of U.S. health-privacy rules by CVS Caremark Corp. (CVS), the combined drug retailer and pharmacy benefits manager.

The FTC already is probing CVS Caremark’s business practices after lawmakers and the National Community Pharmacists Association raised concerns, including allegations the company improperly used patient data from its pharmacy-benefit operation to steer customers into its CVS drug stores.

The NCPA and other groups added to their complaints in a letter dated last Friday to the FTC and HHS’ civil rights office that accused CVS Caremark of violating patient privacy laws–the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, and more recent provisions–by using protected patient information from health plans and competing pharmacies to channel customers into CVS drug stores.

[…]

The allegations center around CVS Caremark’s “maintenance choice” program, which allows Caremark PBM members to use a CVS pharmacy for 90-day supplies of chronic medications at the same price charged by the company’s mail-order pharmacy. Under employer drug plans that require members to use the Caremark mail-order pharmacy for maintenance prescriptions, patients essentially must buy the drugs either through the CVS Caremark mail pharmacy or at a CVS store.

[…]

CVS said the pharmacists’ group is challenging both “the convenient and affordable option of mail delivery” commonly used by PBMs and now “the convenient retail pick-up option that CVS Caremark is offering for our PBM mail-delivery prescriptions.” The company said its services are designed to improve patient health while reducing costs for plan sponsors.

Read more in the WSJ.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Tracking pharmacy records run amok
41% of workers have stolen corporate data – survey →

1 thought on “Groups seek CVS Caremark privacy violation probe”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 30, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    Good luck to the NCPA and other advocates.
    This is an assault against all persons insured by Caremark who need maintenance prescriptions.
    CVS/Caremark needs to be stopped right now from implementing their maintenance prescription plan for 2010. If you do not place your maintenance Rx orders with CVS and instead of the pharmacy you currently do business with, then, Caremark will not cover your maintenance prescriptions even though you and/or your company are paying the premiums for drug coverage.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks
  • Coinbase says hackers bribed staff to steal customer data and are demanding $20 million ransom

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.