DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

So where are the breach reports on HHS?

Posted on December 18, 2009 by Dissent

The following is cross-posted from PHIprivacy.net:

Under the provisions of the HITECH Act that went into effect several months ago, covered entities are required to report breaches involving the unsecured protected health information of 500 or more individuals to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Unfortunately, HHS watered down the law in formulating the regulations to introduce a “harm” threshold, where the risk of harm is determined by the entity who was breached. Talk about letting the fox guard the hen house. If the entity doesn’t believe that the breach poses a significant risk of financial, reputational, or other harm to the individual, then they do not need to notify the individual and they do not need to notify HHS.

I do not know if any of my readers have been checking HHS’s web site to see what entities have been reporting breaches, but I’ve been checking it, as I was delighted that they got the web site ready and available.

To date, however, there are no breaches reported on HHS’s web site.

Curious as to whether this means that there have been no breaches reported under the new disclosure requirements or whether HHS is just behind in updating its site, I called HHS on Wednesday morning. The switchboard transferred me over to my state HHS office, despite my protests that this was federal, not state. My state tried to connect me to another number, which was a non-working number. I called Washington again, this time trying the press office and telling them that this was a media inquiry. Somehow, I wound up speaking to the NHIT Coordinator’s Office, who informed me that they couldn’t answer my question and that I should call OCR, although they couldn’t tell me who or which office at OCR to call. So I called OCR’s main number, and not surprisingly, the switchboard had no idea who to transfer me to but promised to have someone call me back.

Forty-eight hours later, I had still received no callback, so I started calling again. This time, I called the press office first and told them that I was media, was tired of being bounced around and not getting a call back, and repeated my inquiry. The person I spoke to gave me the name and number of a supervisor, and lo and behold, 30 minutes later, I found myself on a speakerphone call with the supervisor and an employee who assured me that he was the right person to speak to and that he would get back to me by phone or email.

I told him he’s my new best friend. It’s now about four hours later, and I haven’t heard back from my new best friend, but I hope I’ll hear something on Monday.

Is it possible that because of the new harm threshold, there have been no reports? Or do you suspect that HHS just hasn’t updated their site? Place your bets now.

Related posts:

  • Obama’s federal data breach notification bill: boon to businesses, but not most consumers
  • Breach notifications needed to be made faster in 2024. Instead, they were made more slowly.
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataOf Note

Post navigation

← PA: Malware opens door to possible information exposure
UK: Shropshire Council found in breach of the Data Protection Act →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.