DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UMC lacks way to log patients’ records

Posted on January 8, 2010 by Dissent

Marshall Allen updates us on a recent breach involving allegations that insider(s) accessed and sold patient data to local attorney(s):

University Medical Center has no system to track patient records, leading to numerous instances in which hospital paperwork containing Social Security numbers, birth dates and other private information goes missing, a state investigation has found.

The investigation was triggered by a Las Vegas Sun story revealing that patient records of traffic injury victims were being systematically leaked from UMC, allegedly to ambulance-chasing attorneys in search of clients. The breach, an apparent violation of federal law, is also being investigated by the FBI.

The Nevada State Health Division examined the public hospital’s methods for protecting patient privacy. It released its report Thursday.

[…]

After reading the report, Jeffrey Drummond, a Dallas attorney who specializes in helping hospitals comply with patient privacy laws, said it’s rare for a facility to take such a “cavalier” attitude toward securing sensitive information.

“This strikes me as pretty outrageous,” he said. “The lack of control over what’s going on in the hospital with regard to patient information, if this (report) is remotely true, seems outrageous.”

[…]

Washington, D.C., attorney Kirk Nahra, who also specializes in hospital privacy compliance, offered a more nuanced view of the report. There’s nothing in the document that directly relates to the leak of the face sheets originally reported in the Sun, he said, and even the most stringent privacy practices can’t stop an employee who wants to commit a criminal act.

A trauma center is a chaotic place where hospitals balance caring for the needs of patients with protecting their private information, Nahra said. The same kinds of problems reported by the state could be found in other emergency rooms, he said, though they should serve as a wake-up call to UMC.

Read more in The Las Vegas Sun.

Balancing?   Keeping track of where you file multiple copies of a medical record and keeping track of access to records does not interfere with patient care, particularly when some of the recording is automated through software.    In fact, having a system that enables you to know where to find information can speed up health care.  Having been involved in emergency care in the past, I could agree with Kirk if he argued that occasionally, a copy of a file might get lost or misplaced in an emergency  room, but to minimize the failure to have a system in place for monitoring access is just excusing sloppy security and privacy practices.  The fact that it may also occur in other emergency rooms does not minimize the importance of the problem, if the report is accurate.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← After further review, investigator doesn't think WDH had to report data breach
MS: Woman out of a job after sending tweet to Governor Barbour →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters
  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io
  • Help, please: Seeking copies of the PowerSchool ransom email(s)
  • RCMP thumb drive with informant, witness data obtained by criminals: watchdog
  • Evoke Wellness to Pay $1.9 Million to Settle FTC Claims That They Misled Consumers Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Rules Proposed Under New Jersey Data Privacy Act
  • Using facial recognition? Three recent articles of interest.
  • India publishes consent management rules under Digital Personal Data Protection Act
  • Republicans Move A Step Closer To Repealing Protections For Abortion Clinics
  • Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
  • Don’t Mind If I Do: Montana Says Hands Off Neural Data
  • 23andMe leadership grilled by lawmakers demanding answers about data security amid bankruptcy sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.