DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CT: Attorney General Sues Health Net For Massive Security Breach

Posted on January 13, 2010 by Dissent

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal today sued Health Net of Connecticut, Inc. for failing to secure private patient medical records and financial information involving 446,000 Connecticut enrollees and promptly notify consumers endangered by the security breach.

Blumenthal is also seeking a court order blocking Health Net from continued violations of HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) by requiring that any protected health information contained on a portable electronic device be encrypted.

This case marks the first action by a state attorney general involving violations of HIPAA since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) authorized state attorneys general to enforce HIPAA.

“Sadly, this lawsuit is historic — involving an unparalleled health care privacy breach and an unprecedented state enforcement of HIPAA,” Blumenthal said. “Protected private medical records and financial information on almost a half million Health Net enrollees in Connecticut were exposed for at least six months — most likely by thieves — before Health Net notified appropriate authorities and consumers.

“These missing medical records included some of the most personal, intimate patient information — exposing individuals to grave embarrassment and emotional distress, as well as financial harm and identity theft.

“The staggering scope of the data loss, and deliberate delay in disclosure, are legally actionable and ethically unacceptable. Even more alarming than the breach, Health Net downplayed and dismissed the danger to patients and consumers.

“Failing to protect patient privacy blatantly violates federal law and Health Net’s public trust. We are seeking a preliminary order to protect patients and consumers, and will fight for civil penalties.”

As a health plan, Health Net is covered by HIPAA and must ensure the confidentiality and integrity of all electronic protected health information the defendant has created, receives, maintains and transmits.

On or about May 14, 2009, Health Net learned that a portable computer disk drive disappeared from the company’s Shelton office. The disk contained protected health information, social security numbers, and bank account numbers for approximately 446,000 past and present Connecticut enrollees.

Blumenthal alleges that Health Net failed to promptly notify his office or other Connecticut authorities of this missing protected health and other personal and private information.

The missing information included 27.7 million scanned pages of over 120 different types of documents, including insurance claim forms, membership forms, appeals and grievances, correspondence and medical records.

According to an investigative report by Kroll Inc., a computer forensic consulting firm hired by Health Net, the data was not encrypted or otherwise protected from access and viewing by unauthorized persons or third parties, but rather was viewable through the use of commonly available software.

Despite its own policies and requirements of federal law, Health Net failed to encrypt this private and protected information or promptly notify Connecticut residents whose personal information may have been compromised.

It wasn’t until six months after Health Net discovered the breach that it posted a notice on its website, and then sent letters to consumers on a rolling mailing basis beginning on Nov. 30, 2009.

Blumenthal’s lawsuit alleges that Health Net failed to effectively supervise and train its workforce on policies and procedures concerning the appropriate maintenance, use and disclosure of protected health information.

Blumenthal’s lawsuit also names UnitedHealth Group Inc. and Oxford Health Plans LLC. While those companies did not cause the data breach, the companies have acquired ownership of Health Net of Connecticut.

Blumenthal thanked those in his office who worked on the case — Assistant Attorneys General Steve Courtney, Tom Ryan and Matt Fitzsimmons, under the direction of Phil Rosario, Arnold Menchel and Henry Salton.

Source: Attorney General Richard Blumenthal

Update: See Health Net’s response here.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← (follow-up) Would-be AIG extortionist sentenced
Comment policy for this site →

2 thoughts on “CT: Attorney General Sues Health Net For Massive Security Breach”

  1. Anonymous says:
    January 15, 2010 at 11:11 am

    Bravo to Attorney General Blumenthal. I am happy to see someone as important as Attorney General Blumenthal take a strong stance toward those entities that are not doing everything that they can to ensure the security and privacy of people’s most confidential data — health records, social security and bank account numbers. With the pervasiveness of portable storage devices and the selling of personal information surging, all confidential data should be encrypted. There are many encryption solutions on the market that are affordable and easy to implement that could have prevented data leaks like these. Therefore there is no excuse for companies that do not take the proactive steps needed to protect your confidential information. From my perspective, AG Blumenthal is doing an excellent job by taking a stand for everyone’s right to privacy.

  2. Anonymous says:
    January 17, 2010 at 2:51 am

    Great post, I love this blog.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say
  • 16 Defendants Federally Charged in Connection with DanaBot Malware Scheme That Infected Computers Worldwide
  • Russian national and leader of Qakbot malware conspiracy indicted in long-running global ransomware scheme
  • Texas Doctor Who Falsely Diagnosed Patients as Part of Insurance Fraud Scheme Sentenced to 10 Years’ Imprisonment
  • VanHelsing ransomware builder leaked on hacking forum
  • Hack of Opexus Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
  • ‘Deep concern’ for domestic abuse survivors as cybercriminals expected to publish confidential abuse survivors’ addresses
  • Western intelligence agencies unite to expose Russian hacking campaign against logistics and tech firms
  • Disrupting Lumma Stealer: Microsoft leads global action against favored cybercrime tool

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.