DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

FTC: Health Breach Notification Rule

Posted on January 18, 2010 by Dissent

From the FTC:

Does your business or organization have a website that allows people to maintain their medical information online? Do you provide applications for personal health records – say, a device that allows people to upload readings from a blood pressure cuff or pedometer into their personal health record?

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes provisions to strengthen privacy and security protections for this new sector of web-based businesses. The law directed the Federal Trade Commission to issue a rule requiring companies to contact customers in the event of a security breach. After receiving comments from the public, the FTC issued the Health Breach Notification Rule.

Under the FTC’s Rule, companies that have had a security breach must:

  1. Notify everyone whose information was breached;
  2. In many cases, notify the media; and
  3. Notify the FTC.

The FTC has designed a standard form for companies to use to notify the FTC of a breach. The FTC will begin enforcement on February 22, 2010.

The FTC’s Health Breach Notification Rule applies only to health information that is not secured through technologies specified by the Department of Health and Human Services. Also, the FTC’s Rule does not apply to businesses or organizations covered by the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA). In case of a security breach, entities covered by HIPAA must comply with HHS’ breach notification rule.

Interestingly, the list of choices for Type of Breach lists:

  • Lost or stolen laptop, computer, flash drive, disk, etc.
  • Stolen password or credentials
  • Unauthorized access by an employee or contractor
  • Hacker
  • Other (describe)

I might have broken it down a bit more to list malware, exposure due to file-sharing application, exposure due to insider error (such as email attachment).  I would also include a sub-level for lost/stolen that asks whether the device was lost or stolen from the premises, off-premises, or unknown.  And I’d give them an option to check if the company received an extortion attempt.   But that’s just me — I love to get more data that can be analyzed and having specific bullets as opposed to “describe” for “other” could facilitate data analysis.

H/T, HIPAA Blog.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← AU: Expert claims health records can't be kept secret
UK: ContactPoint database suffers ‘serious’ security breaches during trial phase →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Dutch Government: More forms of espionage to be a criminal offence from 15 May onwards
  • B.C. health authority faces class-action lawsuit over 2009 data breach (1)
  • Private Industry Notification: Silent Ransom Group Targeting Law Firms
  • Data Breach Lawsuits Against Chord Specialty Dental Partners Consolidated
  • PA: York County alerts residents of potential data breach
  • FTC Finalizes Order with GoDaddy over Data Security Failures
  • Hacker steals $223 million in Cetus Protocol cryptocurrency heist
  • Operation ENDGAME strikes again: the ransomware kill chain broken at its source
  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Period Tracking App Users Win Class Status in Google, Meta Suit
  • AI: the Italian Supervisory Authority fines Luka, the U.S. company behind chatbot “Replika,” 5 Million €
  • D.C. Federal Court Rules Termination of Democrat PCLOB Members Is Unlawful
  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says
  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.