DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Call center employee attempts to extort German health insurer

Posted on February 14, 2010 by Dissent

Die Krankheitskarte web site reports:

German health insurance company (or rather: sickness fund) “BKK Gesundheit” was eager to outsource its telephone hotline to a virtual call center. In their home offices, the untrained workers then could retrieve data they weren’t allowed to see, including medical diagnoses. They all had access to „an unneccessary huge amount of data“.

How was this uncovered? A former member of staff wanted to press money from the fund…

Dr. Ewald Proll, who posted the entry [original in German, here], was kind enough to translate and elaborate on the story for PHIprivacy.net:

The insurer, BKK Gesundheit, is the largest of a subgroup of German health insurance funds with about 1.5 million members. BKK Gesundheit had contracted with MediaKom Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, which, in turn, contracted with Value 5 HealthCare GmbH to provide a 24-hour call service for their insured members.

The “call centers,” however were actually home offices from which the untrained staff could remotely log in to the insurer’s database and where — seemingly due to inadequate security — they could access more information than necessary for their job. Although the staff reportedly could not copy, print, or download the information in the database, it may have been possible for them to take and store screenshots of members’ records that included diagnostic information.

According to published sources, an employee of Value 5 HealthCare GmbH attempted to extort the insurance fund, threatening to the publish the sensitive health information if the company didn’t pay. The insurer did not pay the extortion and referred the matter to legal authorities while securing the database from further access.

The story was uncovered by a TV team.

It will be interesting to see what, if any, fines or actions Germany takes over this breach. Certainly any attempt to extort a health insurer with threats of releasing confidential or what should be protected health information is a criminal matter, but what about the insurer’s actions in contracting and subcontracting with staff where there may not have been adequate security protections? Under Germany’s data protection laws, they might be subject to some consequences.

This entry was crossposted from phiprivacy.net


Related:

  • Russia suspected of hacking Dutch prosecution service systems
  • Korea imposes 343 million won penalty on HAESUNG DS for data breach of 70,000 shareholders
  • Paying cyberattackers is wrong, right? Should Taos County's incident be an exception?
  • HHS OCR Settles HIPAA Ransomware Investigation with Syracuse ASC for $250k plus corrective action plan
  • IVF provider Genea notifies patients about the cyberattack earlier this year.
  • Key figure behind major Russian-speaking cybercrime forum targeted in Ukraine
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataInsiderNon-U.S.Of NoteSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Call center employee attempts to extort German health insurer
MT: Gateway woman pleads guilty to fraud, ID theft →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack (1)
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • White House ordered to restore Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood clinics
  • California Attorney General Announces $1.55M CCPA Settlement with Healthline.com
  • Canada’s Bill C-2 Opens the Floodgates to U.S. Surveillance
  • Wiretap Suits Pit Old Privacy Laws Against New AI Technology
  • Action against tiny Scottish charity sparks huge ICO row
  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.