DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Dave & Buster’s Settles FTC Charges it Failed to Protect Consumers’ Information

Posted on March 25, 2010 by Dissent

Entertainment operation Dave & Buster’s, Inc. has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the company left consumers’ credit and debit card information vulnerable to hackers, resulting in several hundred thousand dollars in fraudulent charges. Dave & Buster’s operates 53 restaurant and entertainment complexes across the country under the names Dave & Buster’s, Dave & Buster’s Grand Sports Café, and Jillian’s.

Dave & Buster’s will put in place a comprehensive information security program as a condition for settling the case. This is the FTC’s 27th case challenging faulty data security practices by organizations that handle sensitive consumer information.

According to the FTC, Dave & Buster’s collects credit card numbers and expiration dates from customers in order to obtain authorization for payment card purchases. The agency alleges the company failed to take reasonable steps to secure this sensitive personal information on its computer network. Specifically, it failed to:

  • Take sufficient measures to detect and prevent unauthorized access to the network.
  • Adequately restrict outside access to the network, including access by Dave & Buster’s service providers.
  • Monitor and filter outbound data traffic to identify and block the export of sensitive personal information without authorization.
  • Use readily available security measures to limit access to its computer networks through wireless access points.

The FTC alleged that, as a result of these failures, a hacker exploited some of those vulnerabilities, installed unauthorized software and accessed about 130,000 credit and debit cards. The banks that issued the cards have claimed several hundred thousand dollars in fraudulent charges.

The settlement requires Dave & Buster’s to establish and maintain a program designed to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of personal information collected from customers. It also requires the company to obtain independent, professional audits, every other year for 10 years, to ensure that the security program meets the standards of the settlement. In addition, the proposed settlement contains standard record-keeping provisions to allow the FTC to monitor compliance.

The Commission vote to approve the complaint and proposed consent order was 4-0. An analysis of the proposed consent order will be published in the Federal Register shortly and will be subject to public comment for 30 days, until April 26, 2010, after which the Commission will decide whether to make it final. Interested parties can submit written comments electronically or in paper form by following the instructions in the Invitation To Comment part of the “Supplementary Information” section. Comments in electronic form should be submitted using the following Web link: https://public.commentworks.com/ftc/daveandbusters (and following the instructions on the web-based form). Comments in paper form should be mailed or delivered to: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.

NOTE: The Commission issues an administrative complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the respondent has actually violated the law. The consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute admission by the respondent of a law violation.

Copies of the complaint, proposed consent agreement, and an analysis of the agreement to aid in public comment are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

Source:  FTC


Related:

  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • UN Cybercrime Convention to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
Category: Business SectorOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Student Hacks Into Valencia High System
ID theft ring exploited medical records to get credit cards →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Once a Patient’s in Custody, ICE Can Be at Hospital Bedsides — But Detainees Have Rights
  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.