DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Foundations can appeal to donors via privacy law

Posted on May 1, 2010 by Dissent

Some people are not too happy about some of the recent changes to PHIA that would give charitable and research foundations your information so they could solicit funds from you.

A change to medical privacy laws designed to help patients and families get better access to medical records will also help hospital foundations get better access to your pocketbook.

Starting May 1, changes to the Personal Health Information Act (PHIA) will mean when a patient requests their medical records the province’s hospitals will have to respond within 24 hours instead of 30 days. The same request by people in personal care homes or by outpatients will have to be provided within 72 hours.

As well, patients will also be told how to authorize another person to access their personal health information.

But the changes also include “the disclosure of patient information… to health-facility fundraising foundations for charitable purposes.”

The only exceptions are if the patient is a child — or if the patient dies while in hospital.

Read more in the Winnipeg Free Press. You can opt out, but again, why should people have to opt-out instead of opting in?

Thanks to the reader who sent in this link.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Insurer rejects claims related to stolen U. medical records
UK: Tax records ‘sold to junk mail firms’ →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Cyberattack pushes German napkin company into insolvency
  • WMATA Train Operators Arrested in Health Care Fraud Scheme
  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.