DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

iPad Breach Update: More Personal Data Was Potentially At Risk

Posted on June 15, 2010 by Dissent

Kevin Mahaffey says that there was more personal information at risk in the recent iPad/AT&T breach than originally revealed:

The iPad security breach last week potentially exposed the emails of 114,000 AT&T customers, but that is not the only information that could have been discovered by clever hackers. iPad owners will be surprised to know that the data breach revealed far more personal and sensitive information than is generally known. Reports initially said only email addresses and ”ICC-ID numbers,” a seemingly unimportant identifier, were leaked. But those ICC-ID numbers reveal a lot about users, their identity and their location.

In fact, just a little fifth-grade math will allow you to turn the seemingly innocuous ICC-ID number into the more sensitive and generally protected “IMSI”—International Mobile Subscriber Identity. (You basically rearrange some digits). This number is unique to each SIM card and can be used to determine:

  • a person’s approximate location—you could track them to see where they are in real-time
  • a person’s associated phone number
  • and, in some cases, a person’s physical address.

Read more on TechCrunch.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackOf Note

Post navigation

← UK: Poor data security in the NHS
The Tie Between ID Theft & Illegal Immigration →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach
  • Cyberattack brings down Kettering Health phone lines, MyChart patient portal access (1)
  • Gujarat ATS arrests 18-year-old for cyberattacks during Operation Sindoor
  • Hackers Nab 15 Years of UK Legal Aid Applicant Data
  • Supplier to major UK supermarkets Aldi, Tesco & Sainsbury’s hit by cyber attack with ransom demand
  • UK: Post Office to compensate hundreds of data leak victims
  • How the Signal Knockoff App TeleMessage Got Hacked in 20 Minutes
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy
  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.