DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Confidentiality breach: Hospital sent patient records to auto shop

Posted on June 28, 2010 by Dissent

Sandra Yin reports on some breaches that weren’t reported previously on this site:

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) found that Children’s Hospital of Orange County sent patient records to an auto shop in 2009, according to the Orange County Register. The business received six faxes containing healthcare information, including information that identified the patient’s name, date of birth, and details about the visits.

Hospital staff told the Register that a test fax should have been sent first, per hospital policy.

In another breach of patient privacy by the same hospital, patient records were faxed to the wrong doctor, because the name of the patient’s ER doctor was not correctly entered into the system. The hospital is checking its database for accuracy.

Read more on FierceHealthcare.

What really bothers me about such breaches is how casual some covered entities seem to be. I’ve called hospitals a few times to alert them to misdirected faxes, and not once did they ever express consternation or ask me to take steps to destroy the fax securely and to confirm same to them, etc.


Related:

  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
  • They were victims of a massive data breach in 2009. Interior Health denied it for a decade.
  • Watsonville Community Hospital had a data breach -- or two. It would be helpful to know which.
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Another printing error exposes SSN
UK: Doctors in database boycott threat →

2 thoughts on “Confidentiality breach: Hospital sent patient records to auto shop”

  1. Anonymous says:
    June 30, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    I work in a hospital, and we take misdirected faxes extremely seriously. If the recipient is in our community, we send someone to go get the information. If they aren’t, we give them a FedEx account number to which to bill the shipping of the information back to us.

    It always boggles my mind that other facilities don’t take it as seriously.

    1. Anonymous says:
      June 30, 2010 at 2:27 pm

      Beth:

      I got so disgusted with one hospital that I actually said, “Okay, since you seem to be so casual about this, I’ll tell you that I run a privacy web site for PHI issues and I just may upload these faxes as an example of how your hospital deals with this issue.”

      Boy, did she get upset then, telling me that I can’t do that because of patient privacy, etc. Uh huh.

      I’m glad your hospital takes it seriously.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.