DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Two computer thefts at Montefiore Medical Center put sensitive data at risk (update 1)

Posted on July 30, 2010 by Dissent

Montefiore Medical Center in New York has experienced two computer thefts in recent months. Although neither incident appears on HHS’s web site of reported breaches as of the time of this posting, a statement on Montefiore Medical Center‘s web site indicates that both thefts involved computers containing sensitive personal and medical information of patients and students. The stolen computers are described as “password-protected” but there is no mention of whether there was any encryption in use:

Montefiore Medical Center has experienced two computer thefts.

During the weekend of May 22, 2010, two desktop computers were stolen from Montefiore’s Finance Department. Montefiore discovered the theft on Monday, May 24, 2010. Some patient information was stored on the computers, including patient names and medical record numbers. The patients involved are covered by Medicaid and/or Medicare, including Medicaid or Medicare Managed Care Plans. In some cases, patients’ social security numbers, dates of birth, hospital admission dates and/or insurer information was also included. No diagnoses or other medical information was contained on the computers.

After close of business on June 9, 2010, three desktop computers were stolen from Montefiore’s School Health Program Administrative Offices. The theft was discovered on June 10, 2010. Some information about students enrolled in Montefiore’s School Health Program was included on the computers.

The information on the School Health computers included students’ names, dates of birth, medical record numbers, parent or guardian contact numbers and whether a student has a social security number. No actual social security numbers were on the stolen computers. For students diagnosed with asthma, the asthma diagnosis, vaccination information and number of visits to our school health clinic were also included. No other diagnoses or other medical information regarding the students was on the stolen computers.

Each of the stolen desktops was password protected.

Montefiore is cooperating with the police investigations. Neither Montefiore nor the police has any reason to believe that the thieves are interested in, or would use, any information stored on the computer. Nevertheless, as a precautionary measure, we are notifying the affected individuals and are providing advice concerning identity protection. Medicaid and Medicare patients, and parents, guardians or students can call Montefiore representatives at Identity Force, Toll free, at 800-295-0136, to find out if they are among the individuals whose information was stored on the stolen computers.

Montefiore takes its patients’ privacy seriously, and regrets that these thefts have occurred. We are implementing additional measures to further maximize the security of patient information.

A copy of the medical center’s notification to those affected by the June incident can be found here (pdf).

Earlier this year, Montefiore also experienced the theft a laptop computer containing protected health information on 625 individuals. That theft, which occurred February 20, was reported to HHS on March 23.

Update: According to a hospital spokesperson with whom I spoke today, the Finance Department theft affected 16,000 patients, while the School Health Program theft affected 23,000 students and their families. No arrest has been made in either case yet. The hospital declined to be specific about what steps they are taking to prevent future incidents of this kind, but note that they are taking steps.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine Report Stolen Laptop
Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine Report Stolen Laptop →

8 thoughts on “Two computer thefts at Montefiore Medical Center put sensitive data at risk (update 1)”

  1. goldie says:
    July 30, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    On notification letter- Why would they tell parents to watch their children’s bank accounts? Most don’t have one but if no financial information or SSN was taken, then why the caution? What aren’t we being told

    1. Dissent says:
      July 30, 2010 at 4:44 pm

      I assume they’re erring on the side of caution on that. But what I want to know is how you have 5 computers stolen from offices, none of the five are reported to have been encrypted, and a 6th computer stolen earlier this year (although we don’t know from where).

      Apart from the encryption issue, where is the physical security on their offices that they had these two most recent thefts? This is very worrying.

  2. Anonymous says:
    July 30, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    On notification letter- Why would they tell parents to watch their children’s bank accounts? Most don’t have one but if no financial information or SSN was taken, then why the caution? What aren’t we being told

    1. Anonymous says:
      July 30, 2010 at 4:44 pm

      I assume they’re erring on the side of caution on that. But what I want to know is how you have 5 computers stolen from offices, none of the five are reported to have been encrypted, and a 6th computer stolen earlier this year (although we don’t know from where).

      Apart from the encryption issue, where is the physical security on their offices that they had these two most recent thefts? This is very worrying.

  3. Beth says:
    July 30, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    I can see how it would happen. Our finance office is in a separate building from the main hospital, and there is no one in that building at night or on weekend & holidays. Jimmy the locks on a few doors (not terribly difficult, especially if the locks are more than about 5 years old), and you suddenly have access to about 2 dozen desktop PC’s. Because the PC’s aren’t mobile devices that leave hospital property, they aren’t encrypted. Even with security making hourly rounds in the building, it wouldn’t take more than about 10 minutes for a thief to have unloaded half a dozen PC’s into the elevator and be out the door.

    I’ve always maintained that anyone doing any kind of security work has to think like the people they are trying to defeat. Thus, why I can think of a scenario in which it would be that easy.

    1. Dissent says:
      July 30, 2010 at 5:08 pm

      Thanks, Beth.

      We’ve seen massive breaches of sensitive information from office burglaries where sensitive financial and personal information were left unencrypted. Although encrypting data at rest poses some hassles in terms of usability/convenience, given the cost of data breaches, and given that theft of computers is a significant percentage of health care sector breaches, I am frustrated that entities are not investing more in better security.

  4. Anonymous says:
    July 30, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    I can see how it would happen. Our finance office is in a separate building from the main hospital, and there is no one in that building at night or on weekend & holidays. Jimmy the locks on a few doors (not terribly difficult, especially if the locks are more than about 5 years old), and you suddenly have access to about 2 dozen desktop PC’s. Because the PC’s aren’t mobile devices that leave hospital property, they aren’t encrypted. Even with security making hourly rounds in the building, it wouldn’t take more than about 10 minutes for a thief to have unloaded half a dozen PC’s into the elevator and be out the door.

    I’ve always maintained that anyone doing any kind of security work has to think like the people they are trying to defeat. Thus, why I can think of a scenario in which it would be that easy.

    1. Anonymous says:
      July 30, 2010 at 5:08 pm

      Thanks, Beth.

      We’ve seen massive breaches of sensitive information from office burglaries where sensitive financial and personal information were left unencrypted. Although encrypting data at rest poses some hassles in terms of usability/convenience, given the cost of data breaches, and given that theft of computers is a significant percentage of health care sector breaches, I am frustrated that entities are not investing more in better security.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters
  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io
  • Help, please: Seeking copies of the PowerSchool ransom email(s)
  • RCMP thumb drive with informant, witness data obtained by criminals: watchdog
  • Evoke Wellness to Pay $1.9 Million to Settle FTC Claims That They Misled Consumers Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment
  • Former Hilliard treatment center employee accused of selling patient data on dark web
  • Trump Rewrites Cybersecurity Policy in Executive Order
  • AMI Group – Travel & Tours notice of ransomware attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Using facial recognition? Three recent articles of interest.
  • India publishes consent management rules under Digital Personal Data Protection Act
  • Republicans Move A Step Closer To Repealing Protections For Abortion Clinics
  • Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
  • Don’t Mind If I Do: Montana Says Hands Off Neural Data
  • 23andMe leadership grilled by lawmakers demanding answers about data security amid bankruptcy sale
  • Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.