DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Your Great Granddaddy Had Syphilis And Now Everyone Knows It

Posted on August 14, 2010 by Dissent

Harley Geiger writes about an issue I’ve discussed on this blog in the past: the privacy of the deceased’s medical records:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) wants to remove health information privacy protections from people who have been dead for 50 years. HHS issued a proposed rule to update health privacy regulations, and most of their modifications were quite positive from a privacy perspective. However, this idea is as weird and terrible as the logo for the scrapped Total Information Awareness Office.

Currently, the law requires that the health information of the dead be protected in the same manner as that of the living. Generally speaking, health care organizations can use patient data for treatment, payment and operations purposes without the consent of the patient, but must get the consent of the patient for most other purposes, like marketing or research. When the patient is deceased, health care companies must seek consent from the dead person’s personal representative, like the executor of the estate.

In the proposed rule, HHS states that the plan stems from the difficulty of locating personal representatives to obtain authorizations to use the health data of the deceased. Specifically, HHS refers to the frustrations of historians, biographers and archivists. (At last, the true might of the archivists’ lobby is revealed to us all.) HHS reasons that waiting until 50 years after death would protect the privacy of the deceased and their relatives.

CDT disagrees. We believe this proposed modification would be significantly more detrimental to patient privacy than it may seem. There are just too many unknowns to make this modification for the sake of posterity.

Read more on CDT.

While I have always appreciated the interest of historians and biographers, and would be fascinated to see the medical records of Edgar Allan Poe’s last hospitalization, I am more concerned about the impact of disclosure on descendants who may find that their forefathers had genetically linked mental health disorders. Could we argue that they are better off knowing than not knowing? Sure, but that would be presumptuous on our part. If new regulations can make it acceptable for records to be released with without a personal representative’s approval after 50 years, what about after 10 years? 5? 2? If we can trace someone’s genes back thousands of years to a particular tribe in Israel, is 50 years really long enough to protect those alive today from potentially embarrassing or upsetting revelations? I don’t think so. So as sad as I would be to lose interesting historical data and insights, I think we need to preserve the status quo of requiring the consent of a personal representative to release medical records of the deceased.

[corrected “with” to “without”]

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← NY: Rent-a-Center papers with personal info found on Buffalo road
Doherty Hotel’s database fraudulently accessed; 150 credit cards subject of probe →

1 thought on “Your Great Granddaddy Had Syphilis And Now Everyone Knows It”

  1. Anonymous says:
    August 16, 2010 at 5:43 pm

    Comments well said. If there is a need to know medical history, I am quite sure it would be passed from one generation to another. Frankly, many people may have been misdiagnosed due to new technology and the ability to isolate a particular illness. Let the dead have their dignity.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report