DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Who Owns Your Dead Son’s Brain?

Posted on August 24, 2010 by Dissent

Over on The Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan H. Adler writes:

Do parents have a constitutionally protected property interest in the dead body of their child, including all organs?  Not necessarily is the answer given by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Albrecht v. Treon, at least under Ohio law as interpreted by the Ohio Supreme Court.

The Albrechts brought a Section 1983 suit against the county coroner, among others, alleging that they were deprived of a protected property interest without due process of law when the coroner removed and retained their dead son’s brain without notice.  According to the state, the brain was needed for additional study to aid in a criminal investigation. The question was certified to the Ohio Supreme Court, which held that under Ohio law the parents have no constitutionally protected interest in their child’s human remains that are retained for criminal investigation purposes, prompting a judgment for the state in district court.  Today, the Sixth Circuit affirmed, distinguishing Circuit precedent that recognized constitutionally protected property interests in a family member’s body parts retained for donation purposes.

There is something disturbing to me about treating body parts as property, and I wonder if that is really the only viable legal analysis or approach. Our society seems to understand the emotional need of families to bury even fragments of their dead and to have that solace or comfort, and yet decisions about whether states have to notify family members of parts removed or offer them the opportunity to make their own arrangements for burial or disposal after any forensic examinations are completed is seemingly left to the states as a matter of property law.

Ugh.

A legal analysis of the case written back in 2007 provides some background and discussion of the issues.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← AU: Hacker hits Ballarat City Council files
NZ: Health Ministry seized 30,000 patient files →

2 thoughts on “Who Owns Your Dead Son’s Brain?”

  1. Anonymous says:
    August 25, 2010 at 5:48 pm

    Medical examiners working on a criminal case can help solve those cases and help pin evidence on the responsible party for a death. I believe the state has the right to hold onto a body part for investigation in a criminal case. HOWEVER, the family should be given a choice to bury the remaining parts now or wait until the full body is provided to them for burial.

    1. Anonymous says:
      August 25, 2010 at 6:13 pm

      There was no issue as to whether the coroner had any right to retain the parts to use for forensic examination as required by state law. The only issue is what happens to the body parts after the examination and testing is completed.

      I wonder how many people reading about this case will suddenly wonder whether they really buried their loved one’s entire body or not.

      A very unsettling case.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • ConnectWise suspects cyberattack affecting some ScreenConnect customers was state-sponsored
  • Possible ransomware attack disrupts Maine and New Hampshire Covenant Health locations
  • HHS OCR Settles HIPAA Security Rule Investigation of BayCare Health System for $800k and Corrective Action Plan
  • UK: Two NHS trusts hit by cyberattack that exploited Ivanti flaw
  • Update: ALN Medical Management’s Data Breach Total Soars to More than 1.8 Million Patients Affected
  • Russian-linked hackers target UK Defense Ministry while posing as journalists
  • Banks Want SEC to Rescind Cyberattack Disclosure Requirements
  • MathWorks, Creator of MATLAB, Confirms Ransomware Attack
  • Russian hospital programmer gets 14 years for leaking soldier data to Ukraine
  • MSCS board renews contract with PowerSchool while suing them

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Home Pregnancy Test Company Wins Dismissal of Pixel Wiretapping Suit
  • The CCPA emerges as a new legal battleground for web tracking litigation
  • U.S. Spy Agencies Are Getting a One-Stop Shop to Buy Your Most Sensitive Personal Data
  • Period Tracking App Users Win Class Status in Google, Meta Suit
  • AI: the Italian Supervisory Authority fines Luka, the U.S. company behind chatbot “Replika,” 5 Million €
  • D.C. Federal Court Rules Termination of Democrat PCLOB Members Is Unlawful
  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.