DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

URMC notifies patients of possible privacy breach

Posted on September 3, 2010 by Dissent

The University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) has sent letters to patients seen by one of its surgeons over the last three years, alerting them to the possibility that their personal health information may be at risk.

Earlier this week, URMC notified 837 current and former surgery patients that one of the doctors who cared for them misplaced a USB computer flash drive that contained protected health information on a set of his patients. The physician used the flash drive to transport information he used to provide follow-up care. The information was copied from other files and so its loss will not affect follow-up care for any patients.

Because the surgeon is unsure exactly which patients’ information was included on the drive, URMC is taking the extra precaution of alerting all of the patients he has seen over the last three years. URMC says that it is highly unlikely that information on all 837 patients was contained on the drive.

The information on the device did not include addresses or social security numbers. However, it did include patients’ names, date of birth, diagnoses, first appointments and surgery dates, and other information about the patients’ illnesses.

Read more on WHEC. As of the time of this posting, I do not see any notice on URMC’s web site linked from their home page.

Really. How hard would it be to download and install a free encryption program such as True Crypt so that all of the data on the drive would have been encrypted?

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Medical data breaches most often caused by theft
Malay court tells doctors to get female patients' consent before taking pictures of private parts →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.