DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Article: Dying for Privacy: Pitting Public Access Against Familial Interests In the Era of the Internet

Posted on September 5, 2010 by Dissent

Clay Calvert, Professor & Brechner Eminent Scholar in Mass Communication and Director of the Marion B. Brechner First Amendment Project at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, has an article in the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy. Here’s how the article begins:

“I just killed my two kids. . . . I drowned them. . . . They are 2 and 4. . . . I just shot myself. . . . with a gun. . . . Please hurry.”

That was the dying declaration of 21-year-old Julia Murray on February 16, 2010, preserved for all of posterity on a 911 emergency telephone recording and available to anyone and everyone in Florida—from journalists and police to even voyeurs and perverts—under that state’s open records laws. Murray and one of her three children are gone (the second child survived the drowning attempt), but her words remain. Should the public have a right to hear them?

In 2010, multiple events magnified public focus on the escalating tension between family members’ privacy rights with respect to the death-scene images and dying words of their loved ones, on the one hand, and the public’s right to access those documents, on the other.

You can read the full article on Northwestern University Law Review‘s web site.   Many of the cases Calvert discusses have been reported on this site and/or pogowasright.org, and it is an issue that warrants serious consideration by privacy advocates, legal scholars, and journalists.

Via Concurring Opinions.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Article: Once More Unto the Breach: An Analysis of Legal, Technological and Policy Issues Involving Data Breach Notification Statutes
Confidential reporting system for Canadian physicians’ health proposed →

2 thoughts on “Article: Dying for Privacy: Pitting Public Access Against Familial Interests In the Era of the Internet”

  1. Anonymous says:
    September 7, 2010 at 3:56 pm

    Is there any purpose, a significant purpose, other that exciting journalism that these taped calls need to be made public? If this was a trial with open records, that is a legal issue that would be decided by a judge. Some judges have respected the privacy of the family and kept such recording out of public record if not needed. This is sensational journalism and nothing more. If people want soap drama, turn on the TV and respect the privacy of families who already are living a tragedy.

    1. Anonymous says:
      September 7, 2010 at 4:04 pm

      One valid reason to keep such records subject to disclosure is for the public to be able to evaluate its government’s response to situations. For example, did EMS respond quickly enough in a particular case? If we can get the 9-1-1 tapes, we can figure out the time lapse, etc. That said, I do see a problem with some of this stuff being released because even though a court might hold that people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in making an emergency call, I would bet that most of the public has never even considered the issue and is in no condition to do so at the time they call 9-1-1.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Dutch Government: More forms of espionage to be a criminal offence from 15 May onwards
  • B.C. health authority faces class-action lawsuit over 2009 data breach (1)
  • Private Industry Notification: Silent Ransom Group Targeting Law Firms
  • Data Breach Lawsuits Against Chord Specialty Dental Partners Consolidated
  • PA: York County alerts residents of potential data breach
  • FTC Finalizes Order with GoDaddy over Data Security Failures
  • Hacker steals $223 million in Cetus Protocol cryptocurrency heist
  • Operation ENDGAME strikes again: the ransomware kill chain broken at its source
  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Period Tracking App Users Win Class Status in Google, Meta Suit
  • AI: the Italian Supervisory Authority fines Luka, the U.S. company behind chatbot “Replika,” 5 Million €
  • D.C. Federal Court Rules Termination of Democrat PCLOB Members Is Unlawful
  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says
  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.