DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Delaware retiree sues Aon, citing “irreparable harm” (UPDATE)

Posted on September 7, 2010 by Dissent

From Courthouse News:

Aon Consulting disclosed online the names and Social Security numbers of 22,000 state retirees, a class action claims in New Castle County Court. The class claims Aon did not bother to scrub personal information before posting online a request for proposals from insurers.

“Gail Slaughter’s identity is likely for sale on the Internet right now,” Slaughter, the lead plaintiff, says in her complaint. “For a minimal fee, hackers throughout the world can use her Social Security number and birth date to secure credit cards, cell phones, and alike (sic). Ms. Slaughter finds herself in this position not because of anything that she did, but because the state’s benefit consultant could not be counted on to scrub the personal information of nearly 22,000 state retirees before posting the date online.

“The harm is irreparable.”

Looking at the complaint itself, it appears that she’s suing the subcontractor and not the state, which had uploaded the RFP to its procurement site. Interesting. The complaint treats Aon’s submission and certification that the submission was in final format and ready for uploading as a “directive.” Apart from other legal issues, I wonder whether claiming it was a “directive” is on solid grounds, as a potential consultant does not really control or have authority over the actions of the potential employer. To the extent that the state just accepted Aon’s submission as ready for posting without actually verifying that before posting it, the state might be the responsible party here and not Aon. But then, I am not a lawyer, and we’ll have to wait to see what a court says.

You can read more on Courthouse News, where you can also find a copy of the complaint.

Update: A story in the Milford Beacon provides a statement from the state as to why this is Aon’s responsibility and not theirs:

Bert Scoglietti, OMB policy director, said Aon is at fault for including personal information in the document.

“Aon takes primary responsibility in this,” he said. “This document went in various formats between Aon and this office in its development. Previous versions did not contain Social Security numbers; the final document was sent by Aon.”

Scoglietti said the benefits office didn’t have to review the finalized document before posting it online.

“Documents, when they’re in final format and ready for publishing, usually at that point you consider them to be final,” he said. “There was no reason for us to think [personal information] would be in there.”

So it’s Aon’s fault because no one could reasonably expect the state to actually look at what they’re posting? I see….

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorExposureOf NoteSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Get news from this site on Twitter
Peel pushes for 'informed consent' over every element of patient data →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.