DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

InterMedia Outdoors reports second “potential incident” — or is just one?

Posted on October 12, 2010 by Dissent

Back in March, InterMedia Outdoors notified the Maine Attorney General’s Office that they had received several reports of credit card fraud after customers had placed telephone orders with InterMedia Outdoors.   According to their notification, the potential breach began as early as August 2009 and was first discovered in February 2010. That report, which I had obtained under FOI, indicated that although they had not confirmed that there was a breach (and hence, any cause),  they had terminated using a third-party vendor to take telephone orders.

But maybe the vendor hadn’t been the problem.  In July, InterMedia Outdoors filed a second report of an unconfirmed potential security incident.  In the new report, filed with the Maryland Attorney General’s Office, they report that this incident began on or about May 13 of this year and occurred during a few-week period in May.  Once again, the fraudulent card activity occurred after customers placed telephone orders with InterMedia Outdoors.   These  telephone orders were taken at IMO’s office in Minnesota and not by any vendor.

As a result of this latest round of reports, IMO has installed a dedicated server to store and process telephone credit card orders and has been scanning their system for signs of unauthorized access.

Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Another laptop. Another car. Another “gah” moment.
Everywhere you look, there are breaches we didn’t know about… →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.