DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Medco coding change exposes prescription benefit data

Posted on October 12, 2010 by Dissent

They probably wished it was an April’s Fool joke, but it wasn’t.  On April 1, United Healthcare learned that their business associate, Medco, had suffered a computer system error that exposed members’ prescription benefit messages on the Medco web site to other members.

In a letter dated May 24 to the Maryland Attorney General’s Office, United Healthcare (a United Health Group Company) reported that they were told that they were one of 25 Medco clients affected by the breach, and that the breach had affected 705 United Health members nationwide.

An investigation of the problem revealed that when Medco changed some code on their website on March 31, the exposure problem occurred. It was detected the next day by two United Health employees.  According to United Health’s letter, the error related to “authentication tools used by the website to validate the user and cache the web session.”

Medco notified affected individuals and offered them free credit monitoring services, even though no financial information were involved.  Medco’s letter states that the exposure problem occurred between April 1 and April 9 and may have included information such as the individuals’ name, “a reference to your diabetes or cardiovascular condition,” names of medications, or date of birth.  No SSN or financial information was exposed.

I’m surprised that we haven’t seen this breach reported on HHS’s web site.   Was it not reported because of some “risk of harm” assessment or for some other reason?  Curious…

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Watch those portable devices, Tuesday edition
Destination Hotels & Resorts update: hack may have occurred in 2009 →

2 thoughts on “Medco coding change exposes prescription benefit data”

  1. Anonymous says:
    October 12, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    Curious indeed. Credit monitoring services were provided because…someone could gather personal information about someone by posing as hir simply because they have a name and these prescription benefits messages?

    1. Anonymous says:
      October 12, 2010 at 6:45 pm

      Maybe they wanted people to believe that they were being concerned/responsive/repentant. PR?

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.