DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Data breach in 2005 fueled a long-running massive Medicare fraud scheme

Posted on October 13, 2010 by Dissent

An indictment unveiled in New York today concerning a huge Medicare fraud scheme reveals how both medical professionals and patients may have their identities stolen in furtherance of fraud. And in this case, a data breach years ago provided much of the identity information needed.

William K. Rashbaum and Michael Wilson report:

An Armenian-American crime syndicate stole the identities of doctors and thousands of patients and used them and more than a hundred spurious clinics in 25 states to bill Medicare for more than $100 million for treatments no doctor ever performed and no patient ever received, the federal authorities announced on Wednesday.

Read more in the New York Times.   The FBI’s press release on the case can be found here and it identifies one of the sources of patient data as the Orange Regional Medical Center.

Reading through the indictment, I see it says that:

Among the [Medicare] beneficiaries whose identities were stolen and used by the Conspirators to defraud Medicare were numerous individuals living in the Southern District of New York who were patients ofOrange Regional Medical Center in Orange County, New York.

Elsewhere in the indictment, it says:

In or around 2005, the names and personal data of approximately 2,900 patients of an Orange County, New York medical facility were fraudulently obtained by a co-conspirator not named as a defendant herein.

It seems that the data from that 2005 breach started being used in  the Medicare fraud in 2006 and may have continued to be used up through the indictment in 2010, although there were other sources of patient data as well.

The revelations raise some questions in my mind:

  1. Was Orange Regional Medical Center (ORMC) aware of the breach in 2005?  How did it occur?  Neither my blogs, ITRC, PRC, or DataLossDB.org have any entry for a breach involving this medical center for 2005.
  2. If  ORMC was not aware of the breach at the time, when did they first become aware of it and how did they first become aware of it?
  3. Did ORMC ever notify the patients whose data were stolen in 2005 of the breach, and if so, when?

I’ve sent an inquiry to the medical center to try to obtain clarification on the 2005 breach and when, if ever, patients were notified about it.   I hope to have more on this tomorrow.

Cross-posted from PHIprivacy.net

Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataID TheftOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Is computing healthcare data breach statistics a waste of time?
Clinic blasts calls for added oversight of porn industry →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.