DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Information Sharing in Criminal Justice-Mental Health Collaborations: Working with HIPAA and Other Privacy Laws

Posted on January 2, 2011 by Dissent

Guide: Information Sharing in Criminal Justice-Mental Health Collaborations: Working with HIPAA and Other Privacy Laws (pdf)

Authors:

John Petrila, J.D., L.L.M.
Department of  Mental Health Law & Policy
College of  Behavioral and Community Sciences
University of  South Florida
Hallie Fader-Towe, J.D.
Council of  State Governments Justice Center

Hallie Fader-Towe, J.D.
Council of  State Governments Justice Center

Source:  U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance

About this Guide

This guide is organized into two parts. The ?rst part focuses on each type of practitioner likely to be involved in criminal justice-mental health collaborations: behavioral health care, law enforcement, courts, jail and prison, and probation and parole. For each type of practitioner, there is a discussion of whether the involved
individuals are considered a “covered entity” under HIPAA or are associated with a “program” regulated by 42 CFR Part 2. There is then a discussion of the circumstances under which an entity can provide PHI and when it can receive it. Each section concludes with several scenario-based frequently asked questions (FAQs) for practitioners. There are additional sections that provide an overview of other types of entities that request or provide information (“business associates” and “quali?ed service organizations”) and a review of an individual’s right of access to his or her own health information.

The second part of the guide, “Working with Privacy Laws,” provides practical advice on the enforcement of HIPAA and 42 CFR Part 2. The Information-Sharing Tools section then discusses what mechanisms different programs have used to build successful relationships to exchange information. It also includes several program examples of how jurisdictions around the country have managed to share information while maintaining ?delity to the applicable legal framework. The guide concludes with a glossary of terms frequently used in discussing information sharing.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Protecting your genetic privacy
MN: Cyber crime trail leads to Winona State students →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters
  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io
  • Help, please: Seeking copies of the PowerSchool ransom email(s)
  • RCMP thumb drive with informant, witness data obtained by criminals: watchdog
  • Evoke Wellness to Pay $1.9 Million to Settle FTC Claims That They Misled Consumers Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment
  • Former Hilliard treatment center employee accused of selling patient data on dark web
  • Trump Rewrites Cybersecurity Policy in Executive Order
  • AMI Group – Travel & Tours notice of ransomware attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Using facial recognition? Three recent articles of interest.
  • India publishes consent management rules under Digital Personal Data Protection Act
  • Republicans Move A Step Closer To Repealing Protections For Abortion Clinics
  • Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
  • Don’t Mind If I Do: Montana Says Hands Off Neural Data
  • 23andMe leadership grilled by lawmakers demanding answers about data security amid bankruptcy sale
  • Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.