DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Doctor-Patient Confidentiality in the Military

Posted on January 7, 2011 by Dissent

Privacy and confidentiality are not the same thing, of course, but an article by Patrick J Mclain,  a court martial lawyer and retired military law judge,  is worth noting on this blog.

Discussing some of the allegations made in the case of Army psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hassan (the alleged Fort Hood shooter),  Mclain notes that although people may think that Hassan was wrong in wanting to report some of his patients for war crimes,  there is a difference in exceptions to doctor-patient confidentiality between federal law and military justice. Although the military rule has  exceptions where there is a duty to breach confidentiality that parallel those in the civilian code, military code has some additional and specific exceptions.

Unlike the federal rules, which do not enumerate a list of exceptions to the psychotherapist-patient privilege, Rule 513 does provide explicit exceptions to the privilege. Some of these exceptions parallel the civilian rules, like reporting cases of spousal or child abuse or situations when the patient is a danger to him or herself or another person. However, some of the exceptions are unique.

Among other things:

  • The privilege ends at the patient’s death
  • The privilege is subject to mandatory reporting duties under not only federal and state law but also service regulations
  • The privilege can be breached when it is necessary to ensure the safety and security of military personnel, dependents, property, classified information or the accomplishment of a military mission

Read his full article on GOarticles.com.

The exceptions he notes raises some other questions in mind – including possible implications for Pfc Bradley Manning, the alleged source of over 250,000 cables provided to WikiLeaks.

Assuming, for the moment, that Manning was involved, it strikes me that even had he sought mental health assistance at any point when planning or having started to implement the copying of data, his communications would not have been protected by doctor-patient confidentiality.  Speaking hypothetically, any confused, distraught, or depressed soldier who seeks psychiatric assistance and reveals that he is thinking of blowing the whistle on what he has learned in the course of his work, would likely be reported.   Any soldier who is seriously depressed by their own actions in particular event or situation might be reported for war crimes depending on the nature of their revelation to the therapist.

Has the military shot itself in the foot by making it less likely for those who might be whistleblowers or conscientious protesters to seek help, assuming that protesters or those who have engaged in war crimes even know the military Rule 513 that limits their right to confidentiality?

Are we between the proverbial rock and a hard place?

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Nursing student wins Facebook placenta photo case against JCCC
AU: Couple fighting govt over right to choose sex of their next child →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Comstar LLC agrees to corrective action plan and fine to settle HHS OCR charges
  • Australian ransomware victims now must tell the government if they pay up
  • U.S. Sanctions Cloud Provider ‘Funnull’ as Top Source of ‘Pig Butchering’ Scams
  • Victoria’s Secret takes down website after security incident
  • U.S. Government Employee Arrested for Attempting to Provide Classified Information to Foreign Government
  • St. Cloud Provides Update on Ransomware Attack in 2024
  • Bradford Health Systems detected abnormal network activity in December 2023. They first sent out breach notices this week.
  • Websites selling hacking tools to cybercriminals seized
  • ConnectWise suspects cyberattack affecting some ScreenConnect customers was state-sponsored
  • Possible ransomware attack disrupts Maine and New Hampshire Covenant Health locations

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans
  • The US Is Storing Migrant Children’s DNA in a Criminal Database
  • Home Pregnancy Test Company Wins Dismissal of Pixel Wiretapping Suit
  • The CCPA emerges as a new legal battleground for web tracking litigation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.