DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

6,500 Blues members’ personal info exposed (updated)

Posted on January 14, 2011 by Dissent

Melissa Burden reports:

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is notifying about 6,500 members whose personal, but non-medical information was exposed on a third-party website, the insurer said today.

The nonprofit health insurer said the breach involved a website created by Harper Woods-based Tstream Software, which was doing work on behalf of Warren-based Agent Benefits Corp., an insurance agency that works with insurance agents to enroll individuals under 65 in individual Blue Cross products.

There is no evidence the information — which included names, addresses, birthdates and Social Security numbers of people applying for individual health insurance from 2006 to 2098 (sic) — was used inappropriately, said Helen Stojic, a Blue Cross spokeswoman.

“We’re in the process of mailing the members letters,” Stojic said. “As a precautionary measure, we’re offering credit protection services for a year.”

The Blues learned of the issue on Nov. 17 when a member reported she found personal information about herself after searching the Internet for her name. Agent Benefits and Tstream Software quickly shut down the site when the Blues requested it, and Stojic said the breach was reported to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

It also sought and received an injunction in Wayne County Circuit Court to make sure the companies preserved data and allowed the Blues full access to data that was on the website, Stojic said.
Members who were affected can call (866) 519-5876 with questions.

Source: The Detroit News

This breach report is interesting to me for two reasons:
1. BCBS named names instead of trying to shield the contractors.
2. They sought an injunction to preserve data so that they could determine what was exposed.

Why did they need an injunction? Don’t they trust their contractor?

And of course, once again we see a breach is discovered by a member of the public. Maybe routine security checks should include randomly pulling a name and googling it to see if anything shows up that shouldn’t.

So far, there’s no indication of when the breach occurred. We may have to wait for the report to HHS to become public to find that out. There’s no notice on the BCBSM web site linked from the home page at this time.

Update: The incident now appears on HHS’s breach tool web site. Curiously, their report to HHS indicates that 2,979 patients were affected (not 6,500).   I’m not sure which is the more current number.  The HHS log indicates that the breach occurred on or about November 17, but from the media report, that was the day they learned of the problem, not when it actually occurred.  So we still don’t know for how long records were exposed and indexed in search engines.

Category: Breach IncidentsExposureHealth DataSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Today’s Award for the Silliest Theory of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
CA: Stolen laptop contained Sebastopol substance abuse patient information →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Almost one year later, U.S. Dermatology Partners is still not being very transparent about their 2024 breach
  • Oklahoma Expands its Security Breach Notification Law
  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was
  • Rajkot civic body’s GIS website hit by cyber attack, over 400 GB data feared stolen
  • Taiwan’s BitoPro hit by NT$345 million cryptocurrency hack
  • Texas gastroenterology and surgical practice victim of ransomware attack
  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty
  • Supreme Court Agrees to Clarify Emergency Situations Where Police Don’t Need Warrant
  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.