DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

ICO slammed for data protection enforcement failures

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Dissent

As regular readers of this blog already know, the ICO has issued fines over data protection breaches precisely four times since he acquired the authority to do so, despite public clamor for him to really get tough. Now Caroline Donnelly reports:

… In total, information concerning 2,565 potential data breaches was passed on to the ICO between 6 April 2010 and 22 March 2011, with action taken in 37 cases.

Chris McIntosh, chief executive of ViaSat, blasted the ICO, claiming that its inaction is doing nothing to encourage end users to tighten up their data protection strategies.

[…]

The vendor has also taken issue with the discrepancy between the number of breaches reported and acted upon within the private and public sectors.

Further findings from ViaSat’s FOI request revealed that the number of reported data breaches involving private sector firms is three times higher than in the public sector.

Despite this, the ICO has taken action against seven private sector firms and 30 public sector ones, with three of those resulting in financial penalties.

McIntosh added: “The ICO has stated that the private sector has a worse grasp of the Data Protection Act than the public, [but] its actions so far do not seem to encourage any improvement.

Read more on CRN.

The ICO has defended his decision-making (see PublicService.co.uk).

Category: Breach LawsCommentaries and AnalysesNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Too-expansive access control lands NHS Birmingham East and North in breach of the Data Protection Act
CA: “Embarrassing” Files Found Outside Blockbuster →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Credit Control Corporation data allegedly from 9.1 million consumers listed for sale on forum
  • Copilot AI Bug Could Leak Sensitive Data via Email Prompts
  • FTC Provides Guidance on Updated Safeguards Rule
  • Sentara Health terminates remote employees after realizing they couldn’t be sure who was doing the work.
  • Hackers Break Into Car Sharing App, 8.4 Million Users Affected
  • Cyberattack pushes German napkin company into insolvency
  • WMATA Train Operators Arrested in Health Care Fraud Scheme
  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.