DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

IEEE members notified of second breach in as many months

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Dissent

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) describes itself as the world’s largest technical professional organization with over 365,000 members worldwide, but some of its members may be feeling a bit beleaguered after receiving what may be their second breach notice in as many months.

In February, the association notified 828 members that an intruder may have accessed or acquired their names and credit card numbers, complete with expiration dates and security codes.

Now, an unspecified number of members who signed up for Term Life insurance underwritten by New York Life Insurance are being notified that due to a mailing error, offers they received to upgrade their insurance plan were sent to the correct addresses but exposed other members’ names and member numbers.

A recipient of an erroneous offer and breach notification  sent the documents to DataBreaches.net. I’ve uploaded them here, complete with the recipient’s notations that indicate that not only was the name and member number not his, but the coverage amount was not his and probably belonged to the individual whose name appeared on his letter.

The breach is somewhat similar in description to a breach affecting AARP members that was reported in November 2010. Their insurance was also underwritten by New York Life Insurance, but in that incident, more personal information was exposed, such as dates of birth. It was not reported in the media who was responsible for that mailing error – AARP or some other entity.

In this case, New York Life Insurance says that it had no role in the privacy breach.  According to a spokesperson for the insurance company, “The mailing address information did not go from New York Life to Marsh… Marsh is handling this incident.”  It is not known how many IEEE members have received notifications.

Marsh U.S. Consumer, who sent the breach notification letters to IEEE members, is a service of Seabury & Smith. This appears to be at least their second breach in recent months. Other Seabury & Smith services have also reported breaches within the past year, including a lost backup tape and improperly exposing a Sperian folder containing encrypted employee information to the company’s medical insurance carrier.


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorExposurePaperU.S.

Post navigation

← HK: Leak fear as hospital loses patient details
Texas fires two tech chiefs over breach →

1 thought on “IEEE members notified of second breach in as many months”

  1. Dom DeMarco says:
    April 21, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    This was a vendor mailing system error and IEEE data security has not been breached.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.