DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

IEEE members notified of second breach in as many months

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Dissent

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) describes itself as the world’s largest technical professional organization with over 365,000 members worldwide, but some of its members may be feeling a bit beleaguered after receiving what may be their second breach notice in as many months.

In February, the association notified 828 members that an intruder may have accessed or acquired their names and credit card numbers, complete with expiration dates and security codes.

Now, an unspecified number of members who signed up for Term Life insurance underwritten by New York Life Insurance are being notified that due to a mailing error, offers they received to upgrade their insurance plan were sent to the correct addresses but exposed other members’ names and member numbers.

A recipient of an erroneous offer and breach notification  sent the documents to DataBreaches.net. I’ve uploaded them here, complete with the recipient’s notations that indicate that not only was the name and member number not his, but the coverage amount was not his and probably belonged to the individual whose name appeared on his letter.

The breach is somewhat similar in description to a breach affecting AARP members that was reported in November 2010. Their insurance was also underwritten by New York Life Insurance, but in that incident, more personal information was exposed, such as dates of birth. It was not reported in the media who was responsible for that mailing error – AARP or some other entity.

In this case, New York Life Insurance says that it had no role in the privacy breach.  According to a spokesperson for the insurance company, “The mailing address information did not go from New York Life to Marsh… Marsh is handling this incident.”  It is not known how many IEEE members have received notifications.

Marsh U.S. Consumer, who sent the breach notification letters to IEEE members, is a service of Seabury & Smith. This appears to be at least their second breach in recent months. Other Seabury & Smith services have also reported breaches within the past year, including a lost backup tape and improperly exposing a Sperian folder containing encrypted employee information to the company’s medical insurance carrier.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorExposurePaperU.S.

Post navigation

← HK: Leak fear as hospital loses patient details
Texas fires two tech chiefs over breach →

1 thought on “IEEE members notified of second breach in as many months”

  1. Dom DeMarco says:
    April 21, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    This was a vendor mailing system error and IEEE data security has not been breached.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • 16 Defendants Federally Charged in Connection with DanaBot Malware Scheme That Infected Computers Worldwide
  • Russian national and leader of Qakbot malware conspiracy indicted in long-running global ransomware scheme
  • Texas Doctor Who Falsely Diagnosed Patients as Part of Insurance Fraud Scheme Sentenced to 10 Years’ Imprisonment
  • VanHelsing ransomware builder leaked on hacking forum
  • Hack of Opexus Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
  • ‘Deep concern’ for domestic abuse survivors as cybercriminals expected to publish confidential abuse survivors’ addresses
  • Western intelligence agencies unite to expose Russian hacking campaign against logistics and tech firms
  • Disrupting Lumma Stealer: Microsoft leads global action against favored cybercrime tool
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • Privilege Under Fire: Protecting Forensic Reports in the Wake of a Data Breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.