DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

President’s cybersecurity agenda includes proposed federal data breach notification law

Posted on May 12, 2011 by Dissent

To cut to the chase: you can read the language of the proposed data breach notification law here.

Sadly, the proposed language allows entities NOT to notify affected individuals if they conduct a risk assessment and determine that there is no risk to those whose data were breached.

Other problems I see on a first reading are:

1. The law would only apply to entities dealing with 10,000 or more individuals in a 12-month period. That would still leave us without a national data breach law for smaller entities. Don’t their breaches put us at risk?

2. There does not seem to be a provision that would permit the FTC to reject an entity’s risk assessment exemption and to tell them that no, they must notify individuals.

3. The proposal does not require the entity to provide important details about the breach to affected individuals such as when the breach occurred and when it was first detected, or even how the breach occurred – was it a hack, or web exposure, or…?

4. The proposal would supersede much stronger state breach notification laws.

5. The proposal does not establish or recognize a private cause of action.

6. The proposal would still leave us without any national data breach notification law that would apply to paper records outside of HIPAA-covered entities.

7. The proposal does not require the breached entity to post a prominent notice linked from the home page of any web site they maintain.

I’m sure I’ll have other concerns when I read this again tomorrow, but right now, there’s just so much wrong with this weak bill that I wish someone would just go smack the WH on its head and tell them to read this blog or other privacy advocacy sites that have been pointing out certain problems and needs forever.

Update: The government has posted a section-by-section analysis of the data breach notification provisions.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesFederalLegislationOf Note

Post navigation

← OH: Laptop with financial information stolen from the home of state Auditor’s Office employee
Eidos and Deus Ex sites hacked, personal data acquired? →

2 thoughts on “President’s cybersecurity agenda includes proposed federal data breach notification law”

  1. Sam says:
    May 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    IN RE #4 above: It was my understanding that state laws were to be adhered to BEFORE considering federal laws addressing the same issues (being that they were always/usually more stringent than federal laws).

    1. admin says:
      May 13, 2011 at 3:53 pm

      I wish you were correct, but Section 109 is quite clear that the proposed law will supersede any state law on notification of a breach involving computerized data for entities dealing with over 10k people in a 12-mo. period with one exception – the states can require the entity to include information on victim protection assistance if it is offered by the state.

      What may not be as clear is what happens in cases of breaches that involve entities dealing with fewer than 10k people per year, etc. In that case, state law may still apply, but that’s a guess on my part as I’m not sure how to interpret the proposal.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.