DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

(update) Baptist Hospital Employee Charged After Medical Files Found

Posted on June 3, 2011 by Dissent

WFMY News reports the latest development in a breach mentioned previously on this blog.

… a Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center employee, Linda Turner, stole hundreds, possibly thousands, of people’s medical records.They say she kept the files in the basement of a home she owns and other storage units.

Prosecutors charged Turner with felony larceny and she was fired from the hospital. She’ll be in court later this month. No one knows why she took home those medical files, including Nathaniel Cravanzola, the person who discovered them in the basement of his home.

When Cravanzola moved into the house, he never expected to find boxes of stolen medical records in the basement. They are dated from 1995 to 2006.

[…]

Hospital representatives came and hauled the records away. He’ll never forget one file folder.

“I had 850 names, last names, social security and why they went to the hospital,” Cravanzola said.

And that was just in one of the folders.

Read more on digitriad.com.

There would seem to be a number of failures here that need to be investigated, including whether the hospital had any system in place to verify whether files that may have been slated for secure destruction were ever securely destroyed.

On another note, the hospital is getting some really bad press from the individual who contacted them as he claims that they told him not to go public or to law enforcement about what he found.  If what he claims is true, the hospital may have some valid explanation as to why they did not want the breach disclosed – perhaps until they could recover all of the documents and assess the situation – but it will probably still strike many people as an attempted cover-up.

Will everyone whose records were found in the home be notified on the breach? Possibly not. According to the news story:

The hospital has a team of people looking through all the paperwork to see what information is out there. If they feel someone’s identity is at risk, they will contact them.

There are many people who would agree that a risk-based assessment is warranted and even necessary so that people do not become numb from too many notifications.   I disagree and think that patients should be notified when a covered entity has exposed their information – even if the entity doesn’t think there’s a great risk of identity theft.   Indeed, the fact that the individual who found the files read through at least some of them to see what was in there means that there has been a privacy and confidentiality breach, and I think people who have trusted the hospital should be informed so they can decide whether to continue trusting the hospital in the future or not.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Lawmakers Question Sony, Epsilon on Data Breaches
WA: Man gets 15 years in county’s largest ID-theft case →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.
  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.