DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NZ: Labour apologizes over data breach (update1)

Posted on June 12, 2011 by Dissent

The New Zealand Press Association reports:

The Labour Party has apologised to donors, after a right-wing blogger said he would release their personal details following what the party called a malicious breach of its website.

In an email sent to donors yesterday, party secretary Chris Flatt said an investigation was launched after the discovery of a possible breach of the online donation system.

Details taken included names, email addresses, and amounts of donations and membership fees.

Mr Flatt said the system had been secured to ensure a breach could not recur, and there would be an independent security review.

Blogger Cameron Slater said he had the data and had done nothing illegal to obtain it.

Read more on the National Business Review.

From Slater’s blog, it appears that he is saying no hack was necessary and that the Labour Party did not realize that their donors’ information was easily available on the web. Slater writes on his blog:

These donation lists have been public for months and I reject any claim that I am a thief or a bludger (Eddie/Jenny Michie, I’m not reposting your link).

Labour makes a great deal of fuss about political donations, in fact they even passed the odious Electoral Finance Act to shed sunlight upon dona tions. Like wise the Greens have made repre­sentations on electoral law reform that suggests that all donations be made public.

Accordingly in line with their previous assertions Labour has made about donors and dona­tions,  I think sunlight is the best disinfectant here and so their online donations will be pub­lished. They have been public any way for at least the three months I have been looking at them.

[…]

…. slack security means that there are hundreds of pages of names and mem­bership details that Labour itself has published for us to examine.

It is not clear from the redacted graphic he provides whether donors’ credit card numbers were also visible to anyone who wanted to view them, and I’ve emailed the blogger to ask about that as the party’s statement makes no mention of credit card numbers being exposed.

At the time of this posting, it appears that a file with donor information was uploaded to Scribd:

That file, however, has been removed:

Update 1: The blogger involved, Cameron Slater, responded to my inquiry by saying that credit card details were not exposed as far as he could tell. NZPA and NBR have since reported additional details on the breach, here.

Related posts:

  • NZ: Labour Leaks — How I did it
  • (update) NZ: National admits Labour data breach – but denies passing names to Whaleoil
Category: Breach IncidentsExposureGovernment SectorNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← One rash of fraud – or two? No one’s telling the customers who have been victimized.
(update) NZ: National admits Labour data breach – but denies passing names to Whaleoil →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.