DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Commissioner says Saskatchewan 'bedevilled' by privacy breaches

Posted on July 5, 2011 by Dissent

Jennifer Graham reports:

Saskatchewan’s privacy commissioner says the province is “bedevilled” by a large number of intrusions into people’s personal information.
Gary Dickson said in his annual report released Monday that his office opened 47 investigations into privacy breaches at government institutions over the last year.

“What we often find is that it’s not somebody hacking into a database,” said Dickson.

“It’s typically a lack of care. It’s carelessness on the part of organizations that are entrusted with personal information, and then curiosity of staff who can’t seem to overcome the temptation to go and snoop in somebody else’s health records or somebody else’s personal information, which means a huge training effort has to happen in our province.

Read more on Winnipeg Free Press

In the report, one section deals with misdirected faxes and the response of entities that were sending faxes to a business assigned a number that had previously belonged to a medical clinic. The number had been reassigned to a business almost two years after the clinic stopped using that number, but a number of entities continued sending faxes to that number. I’ll skip some of the details, which you can read in the report itself, but note some of the findings:

Only 3 of the 9 pharmacies provided notification to their affected patients. Only 14 out of the 31 trustees had written policies and procedures for safe faxing of personal health information.

I concluded that the three principal causes of the breaches were: a change of fax number, use of outdated pre?programmed fax numbers and the carelessness of employees due to lack of training. In my conclusion I stated as follows:

Overall, I am underwhelmed by the response of the trustees to these privacy breaches. Most trustees have not adequately investigated the breach. More importantly, their current fax policies and procedures do not address the issues that caused these breaches, and therefore, are not likely to prevent a reoccurrence in the future.

Just as the U.K.’s ICO has called for sterner financial consequences for entities that breach the Data Protection Act, so too is Saskatchewan’s looking for a big hammer.

But even when agencies have bigger hammers in their tool box, will they really use swing them? And if they do, will it really serve as a deterrent for others?


Related:

  • Maintenance Note
  • CISA Alert: Reported Supply Chain Compromise Affecting XZ Utils Data Compression Library, CVE-2024-3094
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • Fraudster's fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report
  • "Pompompurin" taken into custody after violating conditions of pre-sentencing release on bond (1)
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Fair Political Practices Commission Leaks from Connexion Hack
WA: Clark College issues alert after potential security breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.