DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Walgreens.com site exposed patients' pharmacy records to other patients?

Posted on July 13, 2011 by Dissent

When I first saw a headline in my newsfeed, “Local man finds another Walgreen customer’s info,” I thought this was going to be another story about improper records disposal. My first thought was, “Wow, after all Walgreen has gone through and may still be going through on records disposal, this is the last thing they need.”

But as I read the news coverage by Michael Finney, I realized that this was about an electronic breach involving their online site, walgreens.com.

Finney explains on ABC that a customer who logged in to get his prescription records discovered that he was seeing the records of another customer complete with the other customer’s phone number, the names of their prescription medications, the prescribing doctors’ names, and how much they had paid for their prescriptions and when.

From a medical confidentiality standpoint, this is a serious privacy/HIPAA problem.  From a health care standpoint, it’s also potentially problematic as it created a false medication record about the customer that might confuse or confound his treatment or insurance at some point.

The customer notified his local Walgreens’ store manager who assured him corporate would look into it.  But two months later, the problem still existed and the customer was still seeing someone else’s records and not his own. It was only after the customer contacted the news media that Walgreens got on it.

In a statement Walgreens gave to the news station, they wrote, in part:

 “We are sorry this occurred and have apologized to the patient. We take online security very seriously, and the customer’s account has now been fixed. To ensure users are accessing the correct information, we have a multi-step authentication process to verify the user’s identity online. In addition, we have updated our process for matching patient profiles with online users. We also continue to investigate what happened in this case to help ensure issues are resolved promptly and a similar situation doesn’t happen again.”

It’s  unclear how many other customers may have been viewing other customers’ prescription records or why it took Walgreens over two months to respond to notification that their site had a problem and was leaking data. It’s also unclear why their multi-step authentication was inadequate.

Walgreens has not responded to two phone messages left for them today requesting additional information about the problem but if/when I get additional information, I’ll post it.

 

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Ex-city workers used stolen IDs in costly spree
Ca: Privacy breach at Cape Breton health authority →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Beyond the Pond Phish: Unraveling Lazarus Group’s Evolving Tactics
  • Akira doesn’t keep its promises to victims — SuspectFile
  • Fraudsters, murderers, students: who the GRU assembled a team of hacker provocateurs from and why it failed
  • Order of Psychologists of Lombardy fined 30,000 € for inadequate data security protection and detection following ransomware attack
  • Lower Merion School District says a data breach was caused by a computer glitch
  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • Class action settlement following ransomware attack will cost Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center about $52 million

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.