DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Walgreens.com site exposed patients' pharmacy records to other patients?

Posted on July 13, 2011 by Dissent

When I first saw a headline in my newsfeed, “Local man finds another Walgreen customer’s info,” I thought this was going to be another story about improper records disposal. My first thought was, “Wow, after all Walgreen has gone through and may still be going through on records disposal, this is the last thing they need.”

But as I read the news coverage by Michael Finney, I realized that this was about an electronic breach involving their online site, walgreens.com.

Finney explains on ABC that a customer who logged in to get his prescription records discovered that he was seeing the records of another customer complete with the other customer’s phone number, the names of their prescription medications, the prescribing doctors’ names, and how much they had paid for their prescriptions and when.

From a medical confidentiality standpoint, this is a serious privacy/HIPAA problem.  From a health care standpoint, it’s also potentially problematic as it created a false medication record about the customer that might confuse or confound his treatment or insurance at some point.

The customer notified his local Walgreens’ store manager who assured him corporate would look into it.  But two months later, the problem still existed and the customer was still seeing someone else’s records and not his own. It was only after the customer contacted the news media that Walgreens got on it.

In a statement Walgreens gave to the news station, they wrote, in part:

 “We are sorry this occurred and have apologized to the patient. We take online security very seriously, and the customer’s account has now been fixed. To ensure users are accessing the correct information, we have a multi-step authentication process to verify the user’s identity online. In addition, we have updated our process for matching patient profiles with online users. We also continue to investigate what happened in this case to help ensure issues are resolved promptly and a similar situation doesn’t happen again.”

It’s  unclear how many other customers may have been viewing other customers’ prescription records or why it took Walgreens over two months to respond to notification that their site had a problem and was leaking data. It’s also unclear why their multi-step authentication was inadequate.

Walgreens has not responded to two phone messages left for them today requesting additional information about the problem but if/when I get additional information, I’ll post it.

 

Related posts:

  • California judge orders Walgreens to pay $16.57M to settle charges of improper disposal of environmental waste and records with consumers' confidential medical information
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Ex-city workers used stolen IDs in costly spree
Ca: Privacy breach at Cape Breton health authority →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.