DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Data-Breach Disclosures May Decline 50% Under Proposed Bills

Posted on August 2, 2011 by Dissent

Corporate disclosures of data breaches involving U.S. consumers’ personal information may fall by 50 percent under legislation before Congress.

House and Senate lawmakers have introduced at least five data-security bills this year requiring businesses to notify customers of intrusions if there is a “reasonable risk” that personal data including credit-card and Social Security numbers may have been stolen.

The measures, which don’t define the reasonable risk that triggers a mandatory notification, would supplant laws in 13 jurisdictions including California and Texas that obligate companies to disclose any breach of a system storing personal information.

“A national bill with a harm threshold will likely lead to less notification because the trigger to report has been raised,” Aaron Simpson, a privacy lawyer and partner at Hunton & Williams LLP in New York, said in an interview with Bloomberg Government.

Read more from Bloomberg on SFGate.com

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesFederalLegislationOf Note

Post navigation

← New River Health Association breach highlights a source of confusion in HHS breach tool
AU: Hacked firms could be held responsible for privacy breaches →

2 thoughts on “Data-Breach Disclosures May Decline 50% Under Proposed Bills”

  1. Rex Uranus says:
    August 10, 2011 at 9:33 am

    Under what theory of Separation of Powers would a Federal law “supplant” state laws on this topic?

    Please indicate which Article and Section of the United States Constitution grants authority over this topic to the Federal government, over-riding the 10th Amendment’s directive that “all powers not delegated to the United States … are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people”?

    Federal supremacy over the states is a MYTH propagated by usurpers in the Federal government. It’s time we exposed such claims for the power-grabs that they are. Shame on the author for playing along!

    1. glenn says:
      August 18, 2011 at 11:24 am

      see the Dormant commerce clause, effectively granting congress the right to regulate interstate commerce, and the way it has been interpreted over the years, it means congress gets to regulate, uh, well, everything it wants to 🙂

      However, data breach laws really should fall within the purview of interstate commerce. Any time congress pre-empts state law, it raises and lowers the bar at the same time, depending on the state law it preempts.

      not saying I agree with the power grab, but it’s been that way for a really long time

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Fresno County fell victim to $1.6M phishing scam in 2020. One suspected has been arrested, another has been indicted.
  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.