DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

MN: Fairview Health Services and North Memorial Hospital inform patients of breach due to Accretive Health's security #FAIL

Posted on September 28, 2011 by Dissent

Lorna Benson reports:

Fairview and North Memorial Hospitals are notifying more than 16,000 patients that a laptop containing their personal and medical information was stolen.

The laptop belonged to a healthcare services firm that coordinates services for Fairview. The theft occurred on July 25 in the parking lot of a Minneapolis restaurant.

The computer contained the names of 14,000 Fairview patients along with their addresses, dates of birth, some diagnostic information and social security numbers. Approximately 2,800 North Memorial patients were also affected, but the information on the laptop didn’t include their social security numbers or home addresses.

Read more on Minnesota Public Radio. Maura Lerner and Tony Kennedy of the Minneapolis Star Tribune add some additional details, including that Fairview was notified of the breach within days.

Not only was the laptop unencrypted – reportedly  in violation of Accretive’s own policies and procedures – but their employee left the laptop in a car in a restaurant parking lot. Has the employee been fired?  How often does Accretive actually audit laptops to confirm that they are properly encrypted?  Accretive did not respond to requests for additional information about this incident.

I am really on the warpath about data losses due to unencrypted information being left in unattended cars.  This is the second breach report today involving a laptop with unencrypted PHI being stolen from an employee’s car.

When is HHS going to start smacking some of these companies with fines for this type of easily avoidable and ridiculous breach? And if they won’t, will some state attorney general?

Although this breach will cost Accretive, who is footing the costs for free credit monitoring for those affected, there appear to be no long-term consequences for Accretive in terms of its relationship with Fairview:

Fairview’s chief clinical integration officer Dr. Mark Werner said privacy breach will not stop Fairview from exchanging patient information with Accretive Health.

“The sharing of health information is a challenge that we all face. But at the same time we need to continue to grow our capabilities of taking care of our community and our population of patients better and better,” Werner said. “And having committed strategic partners like Accretive I think is appropriate and part of that effort.”

Part of that effort should be auditing your strategic partners to ensure they are complying with your privacy and security clauses in your contract, too, no? Has Fairview done that? Will it do it now?  And why did the data have to leave the premises instead of being remotely accessible to the consultant?

Yes, you are hearing disbelief and frustration.  There is simply too much information needlessly leaving the reservation and more secure environments to be left in employees’ cars.

But that’s just my .02.  Your mileage may vary.


Related:

  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
  • They were victims of a massive data breach in 2009. Interior Health denied it for a decade.
  • Watsonville Community Hospital had a data breach -- or two. It would be helpful to know which.
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← UKChatterbox urges password change following hack attack
Ca: 1,500 patients' private info lost →

2 thoughts on “MN: Fairview Health Services and North Memorial Hospital inform patients of breach due to Accretive Health's security #FAIL”

  1. Anonymous says:
    September 28, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    Hm, interesting. I blogged about this story yesterday, using the Star Tribune as my source. I’ve gone back to the Tribune article, and it looks like any references to the laptop being a personal one to the employee have been removed. I know it was there as my own post centered around that particular “fact.”

    1. Anonymous says:
      September 28, 2011 at 6:38 pm

      Yep, I had seen that reference to it being the employee’s laptop, too, although I don’t remember which article I had seen it in. But I realized it had to be company-issued because of the spokesperson’s statements about how due to human error, this laptop hadn’t been encrypted, when it should have been.

      It would be nice if papers didn’t do silent deletes and pointed out where they’ve edited or changed a story.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.