DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Senator Franken considering legislation to encourage (but not require?) encryption for healthcare and OMR providers

Posted on November 9, 2011 by Dissent

Coverage by Diana Bartz of Reuter’s from today’s Senate subcommittee hearing on protecting health information privacy in a digital world:

[…]

“We know from the statistics on breaches that have occurred since the notification provisions went into effect in 2009 that the healthcare industry appears to be rarely encrypting data,” according to written testimony by Deven McGraw, of the Center for Democracy and Technology.

“Doesn’t that cry out for data breach protections?” asked Senator Richard Blumenthal at the hearing of Senate Judiciary Committee’s panel on privacy, technology and the law.

In addition to information about illnesses, electronic medical records contain patients’ dates of birth and Social Security numbers and other data that are gold to identity thieves.

Senator Tom Coburn, himself a physician, urged caution in the wholesale adoption of electronic records, saying he feared hackers could break into a records database.

“Maybe we ought to rethink some of what we’re doing,” he said.

Senator Al Franken, chair of the panel, said he was contemplating legislation to encourage encryption, as well as extending privacy protection requirements beyond healthcare providers, perhaps to online medical record providers.

“The bottom line is that people have a right to privacy and to know that their data is safe and secure, and right now that right is not a reality,” Franken said after the hearing.

The prepared statements of the witnesses are available on the hearing information page, linked from the right column, “Witness Testimony.”

I’m not sure we can conclude that because there have been a lot of reported breaches involving unencrypted data that we know that the health care industry is rarely encrypting data. That might be the case, but I don’t think we can conclude that based on what we do know. After all, we’re not hearing about all the entities and devices that do not have reportable breaches precisely because they do use NIST-grade encryption. I think all we can really say is that there are still a lot of breaches involving unencrypted data. Maybe when OCR starts collecting data from its audits, we will get a better estimate of what percent of entities are using NIST-grade encryption.


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • Data breach feared after cyberattack on AMEOS hospitals in Germany
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Theft from Glasgow’s Queen Elizabeth University Hospital sparks probe
  • North Country Healthcare responds to Stormous's claims of a breach
  • Texas Enacts Electronic Health Record Data Localization Law
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Three months after tapes are reported missing, ValueOptions notifies National Elevator Industry subscribers (updated)
Anti-government feeling inspires dump of employees’ usernames and passwords →

3 thoughts on “Senator Franken considering legislation to encourage (but not require?) encryption for healthcare and OMR providers”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 9, 2011 at 8:22 pm

    This is a bad idea. I am not saying that encryption of PHI is not necessary, but a broad statement that encryption is encouraged already exists in HIPAA Security Rule. The normal pathway for an EHR does protect the data. I suspect that healthcare providing organizations have done some ‘reasonable’ effort to meet HIPAA Security through doing a risk assessment, creation of policies, and enabling technology where they can. When I look at the HHS site for breach notifications, the majority look like petty theft, followed closely by individuals that should know better deciding that they are above their organizations rules so they can export large numbers of patient records onto an unprotected device. These people, no matter how valuable to the hospital, need to be publicly punished. The HHS breach notification site is punishing the organizations, the organizations need to punish their people that are violating their organizations policies. I suspect that the HHS Breach notification site is one of the reasons why Security is getting more funding. So, things are getting better, and a regulation like Senator Franken suggests is not going to make it happen faster.

    1. Anonymous says:
      November 9, 2011 at 8:53 pm

      Well, we don’t know what he would suggest to “encourage” encryption. Suppose he offered other inducements such as immunizing them litigation/class-action lawsuits? Would you still think it’s a bad idea then?

  2. Anonymous says:
    November 16, 2011 at 10:07 pm

    Perfect encryption can protect data at rest and data in transit. No known technology will protect data against dumb behavior, nothing is foolproof.

    Nature continues to create better fools.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack (1)
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.