DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

AU: Railcorp blunder as personal details offered in rail sale (updated)

Posted on December 9, 2011 by Dissent

Finders, keepers? Can you just auction off lost USB drives left on trains without regard to whether they contain sensitive information? Maureen Shelley reports:

A bunch of USB memory sticks, which hold private photos and data, left by passengers on Sydney trains were sold by Railcorp at a lost property auction.

Computer security company Sophos, which bought the sticks, said they contained thousands of photographs, work projects, minutes of meetings and university assignments as well as a job application and resum aac (sic).

NSW Information and Privacy deputy commissioner John McAteer said that his office was investigating a possible breach of the Privacy Act by RailCorp and whether it had kept passengers’ private data safeguarded.

Read more on The Daily Telegraph.

Updated 12-14-11: RailCorp isn’t saying whether it erased any data before selling devices, leading to concerns about what they’ve done in previous auctions. Read more on The Sydney Morning Herald

Category: Breach IncidentsGovernment SectorNon-U.S.Other

Post navigation

← Telstra internal website made public, releasing account details of up to one million customers
UK: Morecambe Bay Hospitals Trust under fire: Crudely-titled email sparks watchdog probe →

3 thoughts on “AU: Railcorp blunder as personal details offered in rail sale (updated)”

  1. David says:
    December 9, 2011 at 7:53 am

    It is quite possible that once an item like a USB stick is lost, there is no statutory obligation on the finder to protect the privacy of the contents.

    At best, it’s difficult to see how such an obligation could ever be enforceable.

    1. admin says:
      December 9, 2011 at 8:22 am

      Anything’s possible, but what do their laws proscribe? There may be no statutory duty to protect it (and I’m not sure about that as I don’t know AU law), but can an entity sell personal data without the consent of the data subject under AU law? We need an AU privacy lawyer here.

  2. Major_Tom says:
    December 14, 2011 at 7:31 am

    I am sure if you look at this in the light of anything else, its purely wrong. Courts want to ensure that companies follow the prudent man rule, and with that said, this action is far from it.

    The “finders keepers” side of this is just that. If you have ownership or custody for something, and you are about to sell it, you are deemed responsible for what you are selling. This is no different than someone buying/selling hacked website info or PII. Ignorance may play a part, but 99.9% of the time it doesn’t fly in the courts.

    I’d be interested in seeing the actual description of the auction and how much the bid was initially started for, and the end price paid.

    It’s not all on the sellers here. I am sure the people who lost this data probably did not notify their company, let alone set out on a long hard search to recover it. It seems like its a process that this company has that’s broke. The people in charge of the so-called lost and found are probably lost themselves – anyone with any knowledge of computers or watches TV knows that USB sticks are a potential pandora’s box when they are lost.

    I guess if they like free negative publicity, then they got what they asked for.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.