DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CT: Fairfield man charged with computer crime after hacking into former Wilton employer’s system

Posted on January 31, 2012 by Dissent

Matt Coyne reports that a former employee of Segmark Solutions was able to hack into their computer systems, causing $7,000 damage to the system and misusing corporate credit card numbers.

My question is how was he able to do that? Did he really hack into the system or was his access not terminated when he left their employ in May 2011?


Related:

  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackInsiderU.S.

Post navigation

← Auditors claim inmates had access to patient Social Security numbers
IU Health Goshen Hospital notifies applicants and patients that data may have been accessed →

1 thought on “CT: Fairfield man charged with computer crime after hacking into former Wilton employer’s system”

  1. Major_Tom says:
    February 1, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    There wasn’t much information about how he did it. It could be done several ways:
    1. He may have enabled remote desktop on a server or servers.
    2. He may have had knowledge of a username/password combo that had admin rights (other than his own).
    3. Prior to his departure in May, he may have installed a backdoor/trojan or other 3rd party software to access the servers, or compromised a workstation at the work place. If he compromised a workstation, and knew another account’s username and password, that works too.

    By the way it sounds in the article, it almost seems as if he was using a compromised account or a generic admin account. The article didn’t mention he was logging in with his own account which should have been terminated. If he did use his old accounts, he may be mentally challenged, because he more than likely would be the only one to know the username and password, which would further prove he did the crime. It would be like branding his forhead guilty.

    It appears they have been monitoring his activity to ensure there was only one IP using the account remotely. The probably have alot of log data on what he was doing, and attempted to do, so all that is left is being able to present that information to the courts in a manner that they can easily comprehend.

    Any admin can go into an account after an employee leaves and change the password and gain access to that account if they have rights to modify accounts in active directory. So the cops probably needed the time to ensure they could say over the next xx months, the only IP that used that account potentially came from his own home.

    Damages seem kind of light, I guess it depends on what they consider “damages”. if they are adding in the replacement costs of Credit Cards, administration work to assist in the investigation, additional time spent for admins to work overtime with the police to make a solid case or to have an admin working off-peak hours to restore anything that may have been deleted.

    Hopefully more information will come to light on this story.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.