DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

HK: Suspected theft of reprinted patient records incident at United Christian Hospital

Posted on March 2, 2012 by Dissent

A press release from the government of Hong Kong issued yesterday:

The following is issued on behalf of the Hospital Authority:

The spokesperson for the United Christian Hospital (UCH) made the following announcement today (March 2) regarding a suspected theft of reprinted patient records:

A doctor of the Accident and Emergency Department (A&E) made report to the UCH management that she suspected a box of reprinted A&E patient records, stored in the A&E doctors’ office was stolen on Tuesday (February 28). The reprinted A&E patient records were used for medical analysis and research purposes and involved approximately 600 psychiatric patients who had attended UCH A&E previously. The records contained patient personal data and treatment records.

UCH has activated contingency measure immediately including conducting a thorough search within the A&E doctors’ office, viewing CCTV tapes and checking office entry records to confirm whether the reprinted records were removed by any unauthorised person. The hospital management is very concerned about the case as the entrance of the doctors’ office was locked securely by access control system and password access lock. The case was reported to the police for further investigation today.

UCH patient relations office has started to inform all patients concerned and to tender all necessary assistance. UCH has reported the incident to Hospital Authority Head Office via the Advanced Incidents Reporting System.

All documents lost in this incident were photocopies of patient record which will not affect patients’ treatment and hospital service.

Security patrol to high risk area has been enhanced and the policy of storing patient record in office will be completely reviewed. The management has also reminded staff the regulations in protecting patient privacy should strictly be complied. All unused patient information should be destroyed immediately.

Ends/Friday, March 2, 2012
Issued at HKT 22:06


Related:

  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
  • They were victims of a massive data breach in 2009. Interior Health denied it for a decade.
  • Watsonville Community Hospital had a data breach -- or two. It would be helpful to know which.
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← 1400+ Steam User Accounts Leaked
Leakage from website poses threat to Chinese netizens →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.